跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2511.19842 · v4

Strategy-robust Online Learning in Contextual Pricing

首次提交 2025-11-25 10:16
版本更新 2026-11-09 13:11
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:18
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Learning effective pricing strategies is crucial in digital marketplaces, especially when buyers' valuations are unknown and must be inferred through interaction. We study online contextual pricing with sealed bids from multiple recurring buyers. The seller selects an affine pricing policy before observing the current context and competes with the best fixed policy in the same class. Buyers may misreport their values to influence future prices, a challenge known as strategic overfitting (Amin et. al., 2013). We introduce a strategy-robust notion of regret for multi-buyer online environments, capturing worst-case strategic behavior in the spirit of the Price of Anarchy. Our first contribution is a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for learning affine pricing policies against arbitrary context-value sequences: for every fixed ε>0ε>0, it runs in polynomial time and its regret is O(εT)O(εT) plus a term sublinear in TT. The scheme is based on an online sketch constructed from past contexts. We then propose the Sparse Update Mechanism (SUM), which learns only from a privately selected subset of rounds and occasionally posts a random price drawn from a finite grid. SUM is a PTAS for strategic regret, and its guarantee holds uniformly over all Nash equilibria. Both schemes use an online expert algorithm as a black box and run in (T/ε)O(ε−2)poly(d,T,1/ε)(T/ε)^{O(ε^{-2})}\mathsf{poly}(d,T,1/ε) time. Furthermore, we show that, even with truthful bids, no seller algorithm can achieve regret poly(d,1/ε) Tz+εT\mathsf{poly}(d,1/ε)\,T^z+εT with z<1z<1 in time poly(d,T,1/ε)\mathsf{poly}(d,T,1/ε) unless NP⊆BPP\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{BPP}.

作者备注:30 pages. v3 is the preliminary version published at ALT 2026. This version extends the results to affine pricing policies, improves the regret and running-time bounds, and bases the lower bound on NP-hardness rather than ETH, which was recently claimed to be false

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v4,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v4 · 2026-11-09 13:11 · 最新观测版本

Strategy-robust Online Learning in Contextual Pricing

Learning effective pricing strategies is crucial in digital marketplaces, especially when buyers' valuations are unknown and must be inferred through interaction. We study online contextual pricing with sealed bids from multiple recurring buyers. The seller selects an affine pricing policy before observing the current context and competes with the best fixed policy in the same class. Buyers may misreport their values to influence future prices, a challenge known as strategic overfitting (Amin et. al., 2013). We introduce a strategy-robust notion of regret for multi-buyer online environments, capturing worst-case strategic behavior in the spirit of the Price of Anarchy. Our first contribution is a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for learning affine pricing policies against arbitrary context-value sequences: for every fixed ε>0ε>0, it runs in polynomial time and its regret is O(εT)O(εT) plus a term sublinear in TT. The scheme is based on an online sketch constructed from past contexts. We then propose the Sparse Update Mechanism (SUM), which learns only from a privately selected subset of rounds and occasionally posts a random price drawn from a finite grid. SUM is a PTAS for strategic regret, and its guarantee holds uniformly over all Nash equilibria. Both schemes use an online expert algorithm as a black box and run in (T/ε)O(ε−2)poly(d,T,1/ε)(T/ε)^{O(ε^{-2})}\mathsf{poly}(d,T,1/ε) time. Furthermore, we show that, even with truthful bids, no seller algorithm can achieve regret poly(d,1/ε) Tz+εT\mathsf{poly}(d,1/ε)\,T^z+εT with z<1z<1 in time poly(d,T,1/ε)\mathsf{poly}(d,T,1/ε) unless NP⊆BPP\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{BPP}.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗