arXiv:2511.20104 · v3
The Devil in the Details: Emergent Misalignment, Format and Coherence in Open-Weights LLMs
摘要
Prior work has shown that fine-tuning models on a narrow domain with misaligned data can lead to broad misalignment - a phenomenon termed "emergent misalignment" (Betley et al., 2025). While all tested models were susceptible to emergent misalignment, some models showed more resistance than others. Specifically the Qwen-2.5 family proved to be relatively resistant, while GPT-4o exhibited the strongest misalignment. In this paper we evaluate if current-generation open-weights models exhibit similar resistance to the Qwen-2.5 family and measure misalignment robustness over a range of model architectures and scales. We replicate the effect across nine modern open-weights models (Gemma 3 and Qwen 3 families, 1B-32B parameters). Models fine-tuned on insecure code generation show a 0.74% misalignment rate (compared to 0.07% for base models), matching the lower end of prior open-model results but dramatically lower than GPT-4o's 20%. We identify a critical format-dependent vulnerability: requiring JSON output doubles misalignment rates compared to natural language prompts (0.96% vs 0.42%), an effect concentrated in the Gemma 3 family (1.43% vs 0.22%) and not significant in Qwen 3 (0.72% vs 0.59%). This suggests that structural constraints may bypass safety training by reducing the model's 'degrees of freedom' to refuse. These findings confirm emergent misalignment as a reproducible phenomenon in modern open-weights models, with rates substantially lower than observed in proprietary systems.
作者备注：v3: corrects the description of model precision and withdraws the quantisation comparison (both arms were evaluated at 4-bit). Also corrects the data for Gemma 3 27B educational and Qwen 3 14B insecure; the headline insecure rate changes from 0.68% to 0.74%. Conclusions on model size and on Qwen 3 format effects are revised. See Appendices D and P