← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2512.06408 · v4
Embedding User Comments into Long-Form Reading: Design and Evaluation of Contextual Comment Presentation
首次提交 2025-12-06 20:01
版本更新 2026-11-04 21:12
雷达观测 2026-11-05 12:13
摘要
Online comments offer perspectives on long-form articles but are often separated from the passages they discuss, requiring readers to navigate back and forth and mentally reconstruct comment-text relationships. To preserve these relationships while maintaining reading continuity, we explored contextual comment presentation that makes comments locally accessible at the passages they address. We compared Text-End, Sentence-End, Between-Line, and Click-to-Show in a within-subject study with 24 participants using constructed comments and fixed sentence-level anchors. All three local layouts reduced initial-reading scrolling, with no significant condition effects on accuracy or elapsed task time. Sentence-End and Between-Line received higher comment-accessibility ratings than Text-End, while Click-to-Show received higher physical-demand ratings than Text-End and Sentence-End. Preferences remained distributed across all four layouts.
作者备注：29 pages, 11 figures, 7 tables
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v4 · 2026-11-04 21:12 · 最新观测版本
Embedding User Comments into Long-Form Reading: Design and Evaluation of Contextual Comment Presentation
Online comments offer perspectives on long-form articles but are often separated from the passages they discuss, requiring readers to navigate back and forth and mentally reconstruct comment-text relationships. To preserve these relationships while maintaining reading continuity, we explored contextual comment presentation that makes comments locally accessible at the passages they address. We compared Text-End, Sentence-End, Between-Line, and Click-to-Show in a within-subject study with 24 participants using constructed comments and fixed sentence-level anchors. All three local layouts reduced initial-reading scrolling, with no significant condition effects on accuracy or elapsed task time. Sentence-End and Between-Line received higher comment-accessibility ratings than Text-End, while Click-to-Show received higher physical-demand ratings than Text-End and Sentence-End. Preferences remained distributed across all four layouts.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗