跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2512.10888 · v4

PubTables-v2: A new large-scale dataset for full-page and multi-page table extraction

首次提交 2025-12-12 02:19
版本更新 2026-11-04 05:47
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Table extraction (TE) is a key challenge in document understanding. Traditional approaches detect tables first, then recognize their structure. Recently, interest has surged in developing methods, such as vision-language models (VLMs), to extract tables directly in their full page or document context. However, a lack of annotated data has made progress difficult to demonstrate. To address this, we create a new large-scale dataset, PubTables-v2. PubTables-v2 unifies TE across various levels of surrounding context and, notably, is the first benchmark for multi-page TE. Our evaluations reveal that while current frontier models strongly outperform ($+0.354\ \textrm{GriTS}_\textrm{Con}$) small models on the most complex task (full-document multi-page TE), this gap can be closed or even reversed ($-0.056\ \textrm{GriTS}_\textrm{Con}$) on narrower tasks (cropped table extraction) with targeted training. Data is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/kensho/PubTables-v2.

作者备注:Accepted to WACV 2027

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v4 · 2026-11-04 05:47 · 最新观测版本

PubTables-v2: A new large-scale dataset for full-page and multi-page table extraction

Table extraction (TE) is a key challenge in document understanding. Traditional approaches detect tables first, then recognize their structure. Recently, interest has surged in developing methods, such as vision-language models (VLMs), to extract tables directly in their full page or document context. However, a lack of annotated data has made progress difficult to demonstrate. To address this, we create a new large-scale dataset, PubTables-v2. PubTables-v2 unifies TE across various levels of surrounding context and, notably, is the first benchmark for multi-page TE. Our evaluations reveal that while current frontier models strongly outperform ($+0.354\ \textrm{GriTS}_\textrm{Con}$) small models on the most complex task (full-document multi-page TE), this gap can be closed or even reversed ($-0.056\ \textrm{GriTS}_\textrm{Con}$) on narrower tasks (cropped table extraction) with targeted training. Data is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/kensho/PubTables-v2.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗