跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2601.00592 · v2

Beyond Checklist Compliance: A Tale of the Accessibility-Usability Dilemma across Government and Non-Government Web Systems in Bangladesh

首次提交 2026-01-02 14:43
版本更新 2026-10-28 01:11
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:34
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Examining whether technical accessibility measures align with users' usability experiences across web systems in Bangladesh is of utmost significance, given the country's rapidly expanding digital ecosystem. We, therefore, evaluated 207 web systems using WAVE, AChecks, and Squidler and surveyed 103 young adult users. Automated evaluation revealed mixed patterns across government and non-government sectors, with neither consistently performing better across accessibility, functionality, web practices, and performance. In contrast, participants clearly favored non-government platforms for navigation, usability, clarity, and cross-device experience. Qualitative analysis identified three barriers to practical access: system instability disrupting task completion, interaction and navigational friction, and socio-technical barriers involving information access, service continuity, and trust. These findings show that automated accessibility measures capture only part of users' experiences. Accessible web services therefore require attention beyond detectable accessibility problems to reliable task progression, understandable interaction, information access, and continuity across the broader service process.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-28 01:11 · 最新观测版本

Beyond Checklist Compliance: A Tale of the Accessibility-Usability Dilemma across Government and Non-Government Web Systems in Bangladesh

Examining whether technical accessibility measures align with users' usability experiences across web systems in Bangladesh is of utmost significance, given the country's rapidly expanding digital ecosystem. We, therefore, evaluated 207 web systems using WAVE, AChecks, and Squidler and surveyed 103 young adult users. Automated evaluation revealed mixed patterns across government and non-government sectors, with neither consistently performing better across accessibility, functionality, web practices, and performance. In contrast, participants clearly favored non-government platforms for navigation, usability, clarity, and cross-device experience. Qualitative analysis identified three barriers to practical access: system instability disrupting task completion, interaction and navigational friction, and socio-technical barriers involving information access, service continuity, and trust. These findings show that automated accessibility measures capture only part of users' experiences. Accessible web services therefore require attention beyond detectable accessibility problems to reliable task progression, understandable interaction, information access, and continuity across the broader service process.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗