跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2602.00414 · v2

Toward Autonomous Laboratory Safety Monitoring with Vision Language Models: Learning to See Hazards Through Scene Structure

首次提交 2026-01-31 08:08
版本更新 2026-10-29 07:54
雷达观测 2026-10-30 11:25
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Laboratories are prone to severe injuries from unsafe actions, yet continuous manual safety monitoring, beyond mandatory pre-lab safety training, is infeasible. Vision-language models (VLMs) offer promise for autonomous laboratory safety monitoring, but their effectiveness in realistic settings is unclear due to the lack of visual evaluation data. Safety incidents are mostly documented as text, and existing studies are largely limited to textual understanding. Since hazardous scenes are unsafe to stage or capture, synthetic visual data becomes the only practical way to study this problem. This motivates us to introduce a structured data generation pipeline that converts textual laboratory scenarios into aligned quadruples using LLM as scene graph architect and image generation model as renderer, yielding \dataset: a synthetic dataset of 1,207 $\langle$image, scene graph, ground truth, hazard relevance mask$\rangle$ quadruples across 362 unique scenarios. Experiments on \dataset and seven open- and closed-source models show that VLMs perform effectively given a textual scene graph but degrade substantially in visual-only settings (i.e., where no scene graph is involved), indicating difficulty in extracting structured object relationships directly from pixels. We thus propose \saga, a post-training framework that leverages reinforcement learning to first structure the visual scene as a scene graph, and then predict hazards while aligning attention with relevant image regions. Evaluations with Qwen 3.5 and Gemma 4 show that our method nearly doubles the $F_1$ score over the baseline on our synthetic dataset and achieves an improvement of $\sim 3\times$ on a mini real-world dataset, while preserving general visual understanding in visual question answering.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-29 07:54 · 最新观测版本

Toward Autonomous Laboratory Safety Monitoring with Vision Language Models: Learning to See Hazards Through Scene Structure

Laboratories are prone to severe injuries from unsafe actions, yet continuous manual safety monitoring, beyond mandatory pre-lab safety training, is infeasible. Vision-language models (VLMs) offer promise for autonomous laboratory safety monitoring, but their effectiveness in realistic settings is unclear due to the lack of visual evaluation data. Safety incidents are mostly documented as text, and existing studies are largely limited to textual understanding. Since hazardous scenes are unsafe to stage or capture, synthetic visual data becomes the only practical way to study this problem. This motivates us to introduce a structured data generation pipeline that converts textual laboratory scenarios into aligned quadruples using LLM as scene graph architect and image generation model as renderer, yielding \dataset: a synthetic dataset of 1,207 $\langle$image, scene graph, ground truth, hazard relevance mask$\rangle$ quadruples across 362 unique scenarios. Experiments on \dataset and seven open- and closed-source models show that VLMs perform effectively given a textual scene graph but degrade substantially in visual-only settings (i.e., where no scene graph is involved), indicating difficulty in extracting structured object relationships directly from pixels. We thus propose \saga, a post-training framework that leverages reinforcement learning to first structure the visual scene as a scene graph, and then predict hazards while aligning attention with relevant image regions. Evaluations with Qwen 3.5 and Gemma 4 show that our method nearly doubles the $F_1$ score over the baseline on our synthetic dataset and achieves an improvement of $\sim 3\times$ on a mini real-world dataset, while preserving general visual understanding in visual question answering.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗