跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2602.14961 · v2

The Distortion of Stable Matching

稳定匹配的失真问题

首次提交 2026-02-17 01:38
版本更新 2026-11-13 02:59
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We initiate the study of distortion in stable matching. Concretely, we aim to design algorithms that have limited access to the agents' cardinal preferences and compute stable matchings of high quality with respect to some aggregate objective, e.g., the social welfare. Following the recent agenda of Amanatidis et al. (2021), we seek to find the best possible tradeoffs between the distortion of an algorithm and the amount of information elicited via means of cardinal value queries. As a warm-up, we show that purely ordinal algorithms (i.e., algorithms that only use the preference rankings of the agents but no value queries), including the classic Deferred Acceptance (DA) algorithm of Gale and Shapley (1962), have unlimited distortion. Despite this strong impossibility, we observe that a simple randomized version of the DA algorithm achieves a distortion of 22, and show that this is in fact optimal among all randomized stable matching algorithms. We then consider algorithms that also use value queries on top of the ordinal ranking information. Again, it is easy to see that the same bound of 22 can be achieved with only 11 value query per agent, and thus we focus on the question of improving upon this bound. To this end, we provide two strong lower bounds, namely that any stable matching algorithm requires Ω(n)Ω(n) non-adaptive value queries or Ω(log⁡n)Ω(\log n) adaptive value queries per agent to achieve a distortion smaller than 22, where nn is the number of agents. Finally, we show an asymptotically tight bound of Θ(log⁡(1+nε)/ε)Θ(\log (1+n\varepsilon)/\varepsilon) on the number of queries that are necessary and sufficient to achieve near-optimal distortion, i.e., a distortion of 1+ε1+\varepsilon, for any ε>0\varepsilon >0.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

本文开创性地研究稳定匹配中的失真问题,分析在有限获取基数偏好信息下,如何计算社会福利等聚合目标较优的稳定匹配。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-13 02:59 · 最新观测版本

The Distortion of Stable Matching

We initiate the study of distortion in stable matching. Concretely, we aim to design algorithms that have limited access to the agents' cardinal preferences and compute stable matchings of high quality with respect to some aggregate objective, e.g., the social welfare. Following the recent agenda of Amanatidis et al. (2021), we seek to find the best possible tradeoffs between the distortion of an algorithm and the amount of information elicited via means of cardinal value queries. As a warm-up, we show that purely ordinal algorithms (i.e., algorithms that only use the preference rankings of the agents but no value queries), including the classic Deferred Acceptance (DA) algorithm of Gale and Shapley (1962), have unlimited distortion. Despite this strong impossibility, we observe that a simple randomized version of the DA algorithm achieves a distortion of 22, and show that this is in fact optimal among all randomized stable matching algorithms. We then consider algorithms that also use value queries on top of the ordinal ranking information. Again, it is easy to see that the same bound of 22 can be achieved with only 11 value query per agent, and thus we focus on the question of improving upon this bound. To this end, we provide two strong lower bounds, namely that any stable matching algorithm requires Ω(n)Ω(n) non-adaptive value queries or Ω(log⁡n)Ω(\log n) adaptive value queries per agent to achieve a distortion smaller than 22, where nn is the number of agents. Finally, we show an asymptotically tight bound of Θ(log⁡(1+nε)/ε)Θ(\log (1+n\varepsilon)/\varepsilon) on the number of queries that are necessary and sufficient to achieve near-optimal distortion, i.e., a distortion of 1+ε1+\varepsilon, for any ε>0\varepsilon >0.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗