跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2602.15876 · v2

Should There be a Teacher In-the-Loop? A Study of Generative AI-Personalized Tasks Middle School

首次提交 2026-02-03 03:36
版本更新 2026-11-12 06:10
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large language models can be used to design instructional tasks to align to students needs. These generative AI models can create tasks that correspond to students out-of-school interests in areas like sports or music, which may enhance students interest in learning. However, little is known about teachers processes for creating or modifying tasks with generative AI, despite commercial AI companies claims that they will save teachers time. In the present study, 7 middle school mathematics teachers used ChatGPT to create personalized versions of problems in their curriculum to correspond to their students interests. The prompting moves teachers made and their students open-ended feedback on personalized problems were examined through thematic analysis. Teachers efficiency when creating problems and the ratings of their 7th grade students who received personalized assignments were examined. Results from this sample suggest that having a teacher-in-the-loop may result in generative AI-enhanced personalization being enacted at a broad grain size, whereas students often expressed preference for a smaller grain-size where they receive specific popular culture references that interest them. Teachers used prompting to adjust popular culture references and address issues with the depth, ethics, or realism of the problems generated, in some cases showing epistemic agency. The article closes with an exploratory, design-focused look at scalability trade-offs with teacher-facing personalization, patterns of teacher prompting practices, and opportunities for teachers to exercise epistemic and ethical monitoring of personalization outputs.

期刊信息:Educational Technology Research & Development (2026)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-12 06:10 · 最新观测版本

Should There be a Teacher In-the-Loop? A Study of Generative AI-Personalized Tasks Middle School

Large language models can be used to design instructional tasks to align to students needs. These generative AI models can create tasks that correspond to students out-of-school interests in areas like sports or music, which may enhance students interest in learning. However, little is known about teachers processes for creating or modifying tasks with generative AI, despite commercial AI companies claims that they will save teachers time. In the present study, 7 middle school mathematics teachers used ChatGPT to create personalized versions of problems in their curriculum to correspond to their students interests. The prompting moves teachers made and their students open-ended feedback on personalized problems were examined through thematic analysis. Teachers efficiency when creating problems and the ratings of their 7th grade students who received personalized assignments were examined. Results from this sample suggest that having a teacher-in-the-loop may result in generative AI-enhanced personalization being enacted at a broad grain size, whereas students often expressed preference for a smaller grain-size where they receive specific popular culture references that interest them. Teachers used prompting to adjust popular culture references and address issues with the depth, ethics, or realism of the problems generated, in some cases showing epistemic agency. The article closes with an exploratory, design-focused look at scalability trade-offs with teacher-facing personalization, patterns of teacher prompting practices, and opportunities for teachers to exercise epistemic and ethical monitoring of personalization outputs.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗