跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2602.17700 · v2

MIDAS: Mosaic Input-Specific Differentiable Architecture Search

首次提交 2026-02-07 07:16
版本更新 2026-10-27 06:16
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Differentiable Neural Architecture Search (NAS) provides efficient, gradient-based methods for automatically designing neural networks, yet its adoption remains limited in practice. We present MIDAS, an approach that modernizes DARTS by replacing static architecture parameters with dynamic, input-specific parameters computed via self-attention. To improve robustness, MIDAS (i) localizes the architecture selection by computing it separately for each spatial patch of the activation map, and (ii) introduces a parameter-free, topology-aware search space that models the two-edge node topology during search. We evaluate MIDAS on the DARTS, NAS-Bench-201, and RDARTS search spaces. In DARTS, it reaches 97.42% top-1 on CIFAR-10 and 83.38% on CIFAR-100. In NAS-Bench-201, it discovers optimal or near-optimal architectures. In RDARTS, it achieves the best reported performance among the compared methods on two of four search spaces on CIFAR-10. We further analyze why MIDAS works, showing that patchwise attention improves discrimination among candidate operations and that the resulting input-specific parameter distributions are class-aware.

作者备注:Published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR)

期刊信息:Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2026)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-27 06:16 · 最新观测版本

MIDAS: Mosaic Input-Specific Differentiable Architecture Search

Differentiable Neural Architecture Search (NAS) provides efficient, gradient-based methods for automatically designing neural networks, yet its adoption remains limited in practice. We present MIDAS, an approach that modernizes DARTS by replacing static architecture parameters with dynamic, input-specific parameters computed via self-attention. To improve robustness, MIDAS (i) localizes the architecture selection by computing it separately for each spatial patch of the activation map, and (ii) introduces a parameter-free, topology-aware search space that models the two-edge node topology during search. We evaluate MIDAS on the DARTS, NAS-Bench-201, and RDARTS search spaces. In DARTS, it reaches 97.42% top-1 on CIFAR-10 and 83.38% on CIFAR-100. In NAS-Bench-201, it discovers optimal or near-optimal architectures. In RDARTS, it achieves the best reported performance among the compared methods on two of four search spaces on CIFAR-10. We further analyze why MIDAS works, showing that patchwise attention improves discrimination among candidate operations and that the resulting input-specific parameter distributions are class-aware.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗