跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2603.05093 · v3

From Baselines to Transport Geodesics: Axiomatic Attribution via Optimal Generative Flows

首次提交 2026-03-05 20:05
版本更新 2026-11-07 19:10
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Feature attributions often hide a critical modeling choice: they explain a prediction along a counterfactual path from a reference state to an input. Different baselines, interpolations, and generative trajectories define different paths and can therefore produce different explanations. We study this path ambiguity as a modeling problem. Our central question is whether the path can be chosen by a distribution-level transport process, rather than by a hand-designed interpolation or by the sensitivity geometry of the model being explained. We separate attribution into fixed-path credit allocation and path selection. For a fixed path, we prove that the Aumann-Shapley line integral is the unique attribution rule under fixed-path axioms and coordinate-trace separability. For path selection, we minimize kinetic action over flows that transport a reference distribution to the data distribution, yielding a transport-geodesic attribution principle. We instantiate this framework using Rectified Flow and derive stability bounds quantifying how vector-field approximation errors affect the resulting attributions. Experiments show that Reflow improves cross-seed attribution stability, while learned transport paths yield spatially coherent explanations with competitive deletion faithfulness among the evaluated path-based methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/cenweizhang/OTFlowSHAP.

作者备注:10 figures, 32 pages. Accepted by NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-07 19:10 · 最新观测版本

From Baselines to Transport Geodesics: Axiomatic Attribution via Optimal Generative Flows

Feature attributions often hide a critical modeling choice: they explain a prediction along a counterfactual path from a reference state to an input. Different baselines, interpolations, and generative trajectories define different paths and can therefore produce different explanations. We study this path ambiguity as a modeling problem. Our central question is whether the path can be chosen by a distribution-level transport process, rather than by a hand-designed interpolation or by the sensitivity geometry of the model being explained. We separate attribution into fixed-path credit allocation and path selection. For a fixed path, we prove that the Aumann-Shapley line integral is the unique attribution rule under fixed-path axioms and coordinate-trace separability. For path selection, we minimize kinetic action over flows that transport a reference distribution to the data distribution, yielding a transport-geodesic attribution principle. We instantiate this framework using Rectified Flow and derive stability bounds quantifying how vector-field approximation errors affect the resulting attributions. Experiments show that Reflow improves cross-seed attribution stability, while learned transport paths yield spatially coherent explanations with competitive deletion faithfulness among the evaluated path-based methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/cenweizhang/OTFlowSHAP.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗