跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2603.10244 · v2

Transposition Is Nearly Optimal for IID List Update

首次提交 2026-03-11 05:41
版本更新 2026-11-10 02:01
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The list update problem is one of the oldest and simplest problems in online algorithms: A set of items must be maintained in a list while requests to these items arrive over time. Whenever an item is requested, the algorithm pays a cost equal to the position of the item in the list. In the i.i.d. model, where requests are drawn independently from a fixed distribution, the static ordering by decreasing access probabilities $p_1\ge p_2\ge \dots \ge p_n$ achieves the minimal expected access cost $\mathrm{OPT}=\sum_{i=1}^n ip_i$. However, $p$ is typically unknown, and approximating it by tracking access frequencies creates undesirable overheads. A 50-year old conjecture by Rivest states that the Transposition rule (swap the requested item with its predecessor) is optimal among memoryless algorithms. While known to be false in the strict sense, prior research provided asymptotic confirmation of Rivest's conjecture for restricted distributions. We show that for all distributions, Transposition has stationary expected access cost at most $\mathrm{OPT}+1$, confirming Rivest's conjecture up to an unavoidable additive constant, and showing near-optimality even among algorithms with memory. More abstractly, it yields a purely memoryless procedure to approximately sort probabilities via sampling.

作者备注:To appear at SODA'27

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

作者证明:在请求独立同分布(i.i.d.)的列表更新问题中,无记忆的 Transposition 规则的平稳期望访问成本不超过最优静态排序成本 OPT 加 1,从而在不可避免的加性常数意义下证实了 Rivest 猜想。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-10 02:01 · 最新观测版本

Transposition Is Nearly Optimal for IID List Update

The list update problem is one of the oldest and simplest problems in online algorithms: A set of items must be maintained in a list while requests to these items arrive over time. Whenever an item is requested, the algorithm pays a cost equal to the position of the item in the list. In the i.i.d. model, where requests are drawn independently from a fixed distribution, the static ordering by decreasing access probabilities $p_1\ge p_2\ge \dots \ge p_n$ achieves the minimal expected access cost $\mathrm{OPT}=\sum_{i=1}^n ip_i$. However, $p$ is typically unknown, and approximating it by tracking access frequencies creates undesirable overheads. A 50-year old conjecture by Rivest states that the Transposition rule (swap the requested item with its predecessor) is optimal among memoryless algorithms. While known to be false in the strict sense, prior research provided asymptotic confirmation of Rivest's conjecture for restricted distributions. We show that for all distributions, Transposition has stationary expected access cost at most $\mathrm{OPT}+1$, confirming Rivest's conjecture up to an unavoidable additive constant, and showing near-optimality even among algorithms with memory. More abstractly, it yields a purely memoryless procedure to approximately sort probabilities via sampling.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗