跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2603.25670 · v5

Uncertainty-Guided Label Rebalancing for CPS Safety Monitoring

首次提交 2026-03-27 01:26
版本更新 2026-11-12 19:23
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Safety monitoring is essential for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). However, unsafe events are rare in CPS operations, creating class imbalance that degrades data-driven safety predictors. Behavioral uncertainty, reflected in erratic control signals or rapid heading changes, is often correlated with safety outcomes: uncertain behaviors occur more often during unsafe operation. Yet safety monitoring rarely exploits it. We propose U-Balance, a supervised approach that leverages behavioral uncertainty to rebalance datasets before training a safety predictor. U-Balance first trains a GatedMLP-based uncertainty predictor that represents telemetry windows using distributional kinematic features and outputs an uncertainty score. Its uncertainty-guided label rebalancing (uLNR) mechanism probabilistically relabels $\textit{safe}$ windows with unusually high uncertainty as $\textit{unsafe}$, enriching the minority class without synthesizing data. A safety predictor is then trained on the rebalanced dataset. We evaluate U-Balance on a UAV benchmark and ForEnt, a quadruped-robot entrapment dataset. On UAV, U-Balance achieves F1/AUROC/AUPRC of $0.801/0.972/0.776$, outperforming the strongest safety-prediction baselines by 14.3/2.2/6.1 percentage points ($\textit{pp}$), respectively. While the strongest baseline varies across metrics (MLP for F1 and AUPRC; CNN for AUROC), U-Balance leads on all three. On ForEnt, it achieves $0.522/0.806/0.323$, outperforming the strongest baselines by 4.4/9.2/1.4 $\textit{pp}$. Using the same Bi-LSTM safety predictor, uLNR outperforms the strongest alternative rebalancing methods by 17.0/4.1/8.2 $\textit{pp}$ on UAV and 2.3/6.5/1.9 on ForEnt. uLNR also outperforms Early and Late Fusion on both datasets. To our knowledge, this work is the first to use behavioral uncertainty for dataset rebalancing in CPS safety monitoring.

作者备注:14 pages (main content), 3 pages references, 6 figures, 6 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v5 · 2026-11-12 19:23 · 最新观测版本

Uncertainty-Guided Label Rebalancing for CPS Safety Monitoring

Safety monitoring is essential for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) such as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). However, unsafe events are rare in CPS operations, creating class imbalance that degrades data-driven safety predictors. Behavioral uncertainty, reflected in erratic control signals or rapid heading changes, is often correlated with safety outcomes: uncertain behaviors occur more often during unsafe operation. Yet safety monitoring rarely exploits it. We propose U-Balance, a supervised approach that leverages behavioral uncertainty to rebalance datasets before training a safety predictor. U-Balance first trains a GatedMLP-based uncertainty predictor that represents telemetry windows using distributional kinematic features and outputs an uncertainty score. Its uncertainty-guided label rebalancing (uLNR) mechanism probabilistically relabels $\textit{safe}$ windows with unusually high uncertainty as $\textit{unsafe}$, enriching the minority class without synthesizing data. A safety predictor is then trained on the rebalanced dataset. We evaluate U-Balance on a UAV benchmark and ForEnt, a quadruped-robot entrapment dataset. On UAV, U-Balance achieves F1/AUROC/AUPRC of $0.801/0.972/0.776$, outperforming the strongest safety-prediction baselines by 14.3/2.2/6.1 percentage points ($\textit{pp}$), respectively. While the strongest baseline varies across metrics (MLP for F1 and AUPRC; CNN for AUROC), U-Balance leads on all three. On ForEnt, it achieves $0.522/0.806/0.323$, outperforming the strongest baselines by 4.4/9.2/1.4 $\textit{pp}$. Using the same Bi-LSTM safety predictor, uLNR outperforms the strongest alternative rebalancing methods by 17.0/4.1/8.2 $\textit{pp}$ on UAV and 2.3/6.5/1.9 on ForEnt. uLNR also outperforms Early and Late Fusion on both datasets. To our knowledge, this work is the first to use behavioral uncertainty for dataset rebalancing in CPS safety monitoring.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗