跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2603.26464 · v2

Automatic feature identification in least-squares policy iteration using the Koopman operator framework

首次提交 2026-03-27 22:31
版本更新 2026-11-07 00:38
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In this paper, we present a Koopman autoencoder-based least-squares policy iteration (KAE-LSPI) algorithm for reinforcement learning (RL). The KAE-LSPI algorithm is based on reformulating the so-called least-squares fixed-point approximation method in terms of extended dynamic mode decomposition (EDMD), thereby enabling automatic feature learning via the Koopman autoencoder (KAE) framework. The approach is motivated by the lack of a systematic procedure for selecting features or kernels in linear RL techniques. Unlike previous approaches, no features or kernels need to be fixed a priori in our method. We discuss the theoretical convergence of KAE-LSPI under suitable assumptions, similar to kernel-based least-squares policy iteration (KLSPI). We empirically compare our method with two existing algorithms: least-squares policy iteration (LSPI) and KLSPI. In particular, for the chainwalk problem, the resulting policies are either optimal or nearly optimal for both three approaches. For the cart-pole system, KAE-LSPI outperforms the other two approaches in terms of policy performance.

作者备注:15 pages, 4 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-07 00:38 · 最新观测版本

Automatic feature identification in least-squares policy iteration using the Koopman operator framework

In this paper, we present a Koopman autoencoder-based least-squares policy iteration (KAE-LSPI) algorithm for reinforcement learning (RL). The KAE-LSPI algorithm is based on reformulating the so-called least-squares fixed-point approximation method in terms of extended dynamic mode decomposition (EDMD), thereby enabling automatic feature learning via the Koopman autoencoder (KAE) framework. The approach is motivated by the lack of a systematic procedure for selecting features or kernels in linear RL techniques. Unlike previous approaches, no features or kernels need to be fixed a priori in our method. We discuss the theoretical convergence of KAE-LSPI under suitable assumptions, similar to kernel-based least-squares policy iteration (KLSPI). We empirically compare our method with two existing algorithms: least-squares policy iteration (LSPI) and KLSPI. In particular, for the chainwalk problem, the resulting policies are either optimal or nearly optimal for both three approaches. For the cart-pole system, KAE-LSPI outperforms the other two approaches in terms of policy performance.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗