跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2604.01925 · v3

ImplicitBBQ: Benchmarking Implicit Bias in Large Language Models through Characteristic Based Cues

ImplicitBBQ:通过特征线索评测大语言模型中的隐性偏见

首次提交 2026-04-02 19:43
版本更新 2026-11-10 01:43
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large Language Models increasingly suppress biased outputs when demographic identity is stated explicitly, yet may still exhibit implicit biases when identity is conveyed indirectly. Existing benchmarks use name based proxies to detect implicit biases, which carry weak associations with many social demographics and cannot extend to dimensions like age or socioeconomic status. We introduce ImplicitBBQ, a QA benchmark that evaluates implicit bias through characteristic based cues, demographically associated attributes that signal implicitly, across age, gender, region, religion, caste, and socioeconomic status. Evaluating 11 models, we find that implicit bias in ambiguous contexts is over six times higher than explicit bias in open weight models. Notably, this bias is distributed unevenly across demographics: caste emerges as the most severe while gender is the least affected. Safety prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning fail to substantially close this gap; even few-shot prompting, which reduces implicit bias by 79%, leaves caste bias at four times the level of any other dimension. These findings indicate that current alignment and prompting strategies address the surface of bias evaluation while leaving demographically associated stereotypic associations largely unresolved. We publicly release our code and dataset for model providers and researchers to benchmark potential mitigation techniques.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

作者提出基于特征线索的问答基准 ImplicitBBQ,用于评测大语言模型在年龄、性别、地域、宗教、种姓和社会经济地位等维度上的隐性偏见。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v3,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-10 01:43 · 最新观测版本

ImplicitBBQ: Benchmarking Implicit Bias in Large Language Models through Characteristic Based Cues

Large Language Models increasingly suppress biased outputs when demographic identity is stated explicitly, yet may still exhibit implicit biases when identity is conveyed indirectly. Existing benchmarks use name based proxies to detect implicit biases, which carry weak associations with many social demographics and cannot extend to dimensions like age or socioeconomic status. We introduce ImplicitBBQ, a QA benchmark that evaluates implicit bias through characteristic based cues, demographically associated attributes that signal implicitly, across age, gender, region, religion, caste, and socioeconomic status. Evaluating 11 models, we find that implicit bias in ambiguous contexts is over six times higher than explicit bias in open weight models. Notably, this bias is distributed unevenly across demographics: caste emerges as the most severe while gender is the least affected. Safety prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning fail to substantially close this gap; even few-shot prompting, which reduces implicit bias by 79%, leaves caste bias at four times the level of any other dimension. These findings indicate that current alignment and prompting strategies address the surface of bias evaluation while leaving demographically associated stereotypic associations largely unresolved. We publicly release our code and dataset for model providers and researchers to benchmark potential mitigation techniques.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗