跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2604.17120 · v3

Sloan's Analytical Gömböc: Strict Convexity Narrows the Admissible $β$ Range

首次提交 2026-04-19 03:41
版本更新 2026-11-06 06:20
雷达观测 2026-11-09 10:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Varkonyi and Domokos (2006) proved that convex homogeneous bodies with exactly one stable and one unstable equilibrium point exist. Sloan (2023) gave the first analytical parameterization, with radial function $R(θ,φ)$ having exactly two critical points on $S^2$. This is the v3 amendment-of-record of arXiv:2604.17120 (v3 corrects an attribution in the v2 title and abstract; no finding changes). v1 claimed Sloan's parameterization does not produce mono-monostatic bodies and reported a 13-member catalog of Fourier/radial extensions certified at ECS=1 via mesh-vertex drainage-basin analysis. Following correspondence with P. L. Varkonyi (BME), an analytical verification suite was built around the Varkonyi-Gauss identity. Finding 1: Sloan's parameterization does produce mono-monostatic bodies in a strictly-convex sub-regime ($β\lesssim 0.036$), where $K_{\min} > 0$ and the identity certifies ECS=1. v1 missed this because its mesh-vertex oracle over-counted on shallow COM-height landscapes. Sloan states that $β\le 0.17$ should suffice for convexity, but at $β=0.05$, inside that range, strict convexity is lost ($K_{\min}=-0.569$; $K<0$ over 4.01% of surface) and the identity's precondition fails. v1's "global surface information" mechanism is replaced by the strict-convexity precondition. Finding 2: Of v1's 13 catalog instances only Phase-1 ($β=0.023149$, $a_1=0.234433$, $k=1$) survives identity-based verification; the remaining twelve were per-$k$ optimizer extrema overshooting the strict-convex boundary. Probing the regime interior verifies further mono-monostatic bodies in $k=2$ and $k=3$ sub-families: the verified set is an open regime in $(β, a_1, k)$, not a discrete list. Finding 3: v1's ECS=1 readings for the 9 radial-family members reflected drainage-basin merging; the $r=0.9993$ gentleness-robustness correlation is retracted.

作者备注:15 pages, 5 tables. v3 amendment-of-record of arXiv:2604.17120: corrects an attribution in the v2 title and abstract (Sloan states convexity bounds beta <= 0.15 and 0.17; beta = 0.05 is this work's own parameter). No finding changes. Adds a curvature cross-check and cites arXiv:2608.11213 and the Wolfram MathWorld entry. Companion to arXiv:2604.12238 (Part I)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-06 06:20 · 最新观测版本

Sloan's Analytical Gömböc: Strict Convexity Narrows the Admissible $β$ Range

Varkonyi and Domokos (2006) proved that convex homogeneous bodies with exactly one stable and one unstable equilibrium point exist. Sloan (2023) gave the first analytical parameterization, with radial function $R(θ,φ)$ having exactly two critical points on $S^2$. This is the v3 amendment-of-record of arXiv:2604.17120 (v3 corrects an attribution in the v2 title and abstract; no finding changes). v1 claimed Sloan's parameterization does not produce mono-monostatic bodies and reported a 13-member catalog of Fourier/radial extensions certified at ECS=1 via mesh-vertex drainage-basin analysis. Following correspondence with P. L. Varkonyi (BME), an analytical verification suite was built around the Varkonyi-Gauss identity. Finding 1: Sloan's parameterization does produce mono-monostatic bodies in a strictly-convex sub-regime ($β\lesssim 0.036$), where $K_{\min} > 0$ and the identity certifies ECS=1. v1 missed this because its mesh-vertex oracle over-counted on shallow COM-height landscapes. Sloan states that $β\le 0.17$ should suffice for convexity, but at $β=0.05$, inside that range, strict convexity is lost ($K_{\min}=-0.569$; $K<0$ over 4.01% of surface) and the identity's precondition fails. v1's "global surface information" mechanism is replaced by the strict-convexity precondition. Finding 2: Of v1's 13 catalog instances only Phase-1 ($β=0.023149$, $a_1=0.234433$, $k=1$) survives identity-based verification; the remaining twelve were per-$k$ optimizer extrema overshooting the strict-convex boundary. Probing the regime interior verifies further mono-monostatic bodies in $k=2$ and $k=3$ sub-families: the verified set is an open regime in $(β, a_1, k)$, not a discrete list. Finding 3: v1's ECS=1 readings for the 9 radial-family members reflected drainage-basin merging; the $r=0.9993$ gentleness-robustness correlation is retracted.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗