跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2604.22294 · v3

SLIDERS: Evidence Synthesis with Autonomous Database Reconciliation for Systematic Reviews

首次提交 2026-04-24 15:16
版本更新 2026-11-11 17:03
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Systematic reviews requires comprehensive evidence synthesis from large document corpora to answer targeted research questions and are foundational in finance, social sciences, and other technical fields. Manual construction of evidence tables is labor-intensive, and recent LLM-based assistants relying on embedding or keyword search often fail to meet the coverage standards of systematic reviews. We introduce SLIDERS, a novel LLM-based methodology for automatically assembling evidence tables tailored to research questions for systematic reviews. SLIDERS extracts full-text excerpts that serve as direct evidence or as provenance for structured data. Core to SLIDERS is an autonomous evidence reconciliation coding agent that iteratively writes SQL to analyze and reconcile extracted evidence, bringing together information fragmented across documents, resolving inconsistencies and removing duplicates across records. We evaluate SLIDERS on BrowseComp+, achieving 90% accuracy, and show that it outperforms all baselines on additional benchmarks within the LLM's context window. To assess scalability, we introduce two new evidence-synthesis benchmarks, WikiCeleb100 (3.9M tokens) and FinQ100 (36M tokens), which include follow-up questions beyond the original research query. Although SLIDERS synthesizes evidence knowing only the original question, it answers 78.9% and 55.2% of all questions correctly on WikiCeleb100 and FinQ100, respectively

作者备注:62 pages (10 main), NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-11 17:03 · 最新观测版本

SLIDERS: Evidence Synthesis with Autonomous Database Reconciliation for Systematic Reviews

Systematic reviews requires comprehensive evidence synthesis from large document corpora to answer targeted research questions and are foundational in finance, social sciences, and other technical fields. Manual construction of evidence tables is labor-intensive, and recent LLM-based assistants relying on embedding or keyword search often fail to meet the coverage standards of systematic reviews. We introduce SLIDERS, a novel LLM-based methodology for automatically assembling evidence tables tailored to research questions for systematic reviews. SLIDERS extracts full-text excerpts that serve as direct evidence or as provenance for structured data. Core to SLIDERS is an autonomous evidence reconciliation coding agent that iteratively writes SQL to analyze and reconcile extracted evidence, bringing together information fragmented across documents, resolving inconsistencies and removing duplicates across records. We evaluate SLIDERS on BrowseComp+, achieving 90% accuracy, and show that it outperforms all baselines on additional benchmarks within the LLM's context window. To assess scalability, we introduce two new evidence-synthesis benchmarks, WikiCeleb100 (3.9M tokens) and FinQ100 (36M tokens), which include follow-up questions beyond the original research query. Although SLIDERS synthesizes evidence knowing only the original question, it answers 78.9% and 55.2% of all questions correctly on WikiCeleb100 and FinQ100, respectively

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗