跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.06914 · v2

Pacing Branch Parallelism in LLM Serving

首次提交 2026-05-08 04:23
版本更新 2026-11-02 07:01
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:42
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Recent methods expose intra-request parallelism in LLM outputs, allowing independent branches to decode concurrently. Existing serving systems execute these branches eagerly or under fixed caps. We show that both are brittle: eager admission inflates the shared decode step, degrading co-batched requests in serial stages, while conservative fixed caps forgo the throughput that motivated exposing branches in the first place. We call the excess step latency caused by admitted branches the \emph{branch externality} and show that the safe width depends on batch composition, context lengths, and accumulated slack, all of which change continuously over a workload trace. We introduce PACE, a per-step admission controller that treats extra branches as opportunistic width, admitted only when the predicted branch externality fits within the batch's current slack budget. Per-step regulation is practical because branch-level scheduling decouples compute from memory: branches share the request's prefix KV, so expanding or contracting width requires no memory reclamation. On Qwen3-32B, PACE improves goodput by $1.77\times$ over serving without branch parallelism and by $1.48\times$ over eager admission while maintaining 99\% SLO attainment. Comparable gains ($1.72$--$2.15\times$) hold on five additional dense and mixture-of-experts models with up to 671B parameters. Code is available at https://github.com/Swapnil-Gandhi/PACE

作者备注:NeurIPS'26 | Camera-Ready

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-02 07:01 · 最新观测版本

Pacing Branch Parallelism in LLM Serving

Recent methods expose intra-request parallelism in LLM outputs, allowing independent branches to decode concurrently. Existing serving systems execute these branches eagerly or under fixed caps. We show that both are brittle: eager admission inflates the shared decode step, degrading co-batched requests in serial stages, while conservative fixed caps forgo the throughput that motivated exposing branches in the first place. We call the excess step latency caused by admitted branches the \emph{branch externality} and show that the safe width depends on batch composition, context lengths, and accumulated slack, all of which change continuously over a workload trace. We introduce PACE, a per-step admission controller that treats extra branches as opportunistic width, admitted only when the predicted branch externality fits within the batch's current slack budget. Per-step regulation is practical because branch-level scheduling decouples compute from memory: branches share the request's prefix KV, so expanding or contracting width requires no memory reclamation. On Qwen3-32B, PACE improves goodput by $1.77\times$ over serving without branch parallelism and by $1.48\times$ over eager admission while maintaining 99\% SLO attainment. Comparable gains ($1.72$--$2.15\times$) hold on five additional dense and mixture-of-experts models with up to 671B parameters. Code is available at https://github.com/Swapnil-Gandhi/PACE

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗