跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.07654 · v2

Reliable Chain-of-Thought via Prefix Consistency

首次提交 2026-05-08 20:28
版本更新 2026-11-07 15:47
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large language models often improve accuracy on reasoning tasks by sampling multiple chain-of-thought (CoT) traces and aggregating them with majority voting, a test-time technique called self-consistency. When we truncate a CoT partway through and regenerate the remainder, we observe that traces with correct answers reproduce their original answer more often than traces with wrong answers. We use this difference as a reliability signal, prefix consistency, that weights each candidate answer by how often it reappears under regeneration. It requires no access to token log-probabilities or self-rating prompts. Across five reasoning models and four math and science benchmarks, prefix consistency is the best correctness predictor in most settings, and reweighting votes by this signal reaches the plateau accuracy of majority voting with up to $21\times$ fewer tokens (median $4.6\times$). Our code is available at https://github.com/naoto-iwase/prefix-consistency.

作者备注:Accepted at NeurIPS 2026. Project page: https://naoto-iwase.github.io/prefix-consistency-page. We revised the paper for clarity and presentation. All results remain unchanged

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-07 15:47 · 最新观测版本

Reliable Chain-of-Thought via Prefix Consistency

Large language models often improve accuracy on reasoning tasks by sampling multiple chain-of-thought (CoT) traces and aggregating them with majority voting, a test-time technique called self-consistency. When we truncate a CoT partway through and regenerate the remainder, we observe that traces with correct answers reproduce their original answer more often than traces with wrong answers. We use this difference as a reliability signal, prefix consistency, that weights each candidate answer by how often it reappears under regeneration. It requires no access to token log-probabilities or self-rating prompts. Across five reasoning models and four math and science benchmarks, prefix consistency is the best correctness predictor in most settings, and reweighting votes by this signal reaches the plateau accuracy of majority voting with up to $21\times$ fewer tokens (median $4.6\times$). Our code is available at https://github.com/naoto-iwase/prefix-consistency.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗