跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.20555 · v3

LAPO: KL-Free Logit-Averaged Policy Optimization to Leverage RL and SFT in LLM Post-Training

首次提交 2026-05-20 07:15
版本更新 2026-11-08 05:44
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

From a classical statistical perspective, model averaging and parameter shrinkage (e.g., Ridge regression with an $l_2$-penalty) are deeply connected mechanisms designed to reduce estimator variance and lower mean squared error. Motivated by this insight, we introduce Logit-Averaged Policy Optimization (LAPO), a KL-free and critic-free post-training framework that replaces explicit KL regularization with logit averaging inside Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO); in particular, averaging the logits of the trainable policy and a frozen reference policy functions as an implicit structural regularizer that stabilizes rollout trajectories. For selecting the mixing weight, we propose a compute-efficient adaptive algorithm that dynamically balances exploration and structural anchoring throughout training, evaluated against a static fixed-weight baseline. This adaptive mechanism eliminates explicit KL penalty backpropagation and expensive, fragile hyperparameter sweeps while reducing the incidence of uninformative zero-reward rollout groups. Mathematically, embedding logit averaging within the reinforcement learning loop operates as an in-training Product of Experts (PoE): the multiplicative geometric mean enables the reference anchor to act as a soft logical "AND" that vetoes non-compliant tokens, enforcing schema rigor and safety guardrails without the catastrophic forgetting typical of sequential fine-tuning. Evaluated across Qwen2.5-Instruct models (1.5B, 3B, and 7B), LAPO consistently outperforms canonical KL-regularized GRPO, achieving a 7%-15% accuracy gain on MATH and a 2%-5% gain on cn_k12 and MMLU. Finally, the resulting mixed teacher policy can be distilled back into a single student network, fully restoring standard $1\times$ inference latency.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-08 05:44 · 最新观测版本

LAPO: KL-Free Logit-Averaged Policy Optimization to Leverage RL and SFT in LLM Post-Training

From a classical statistical perspective, model averaging and parameter shrinkage (e.g., Ridge regression with an $l_2$-penalty) are deeply connected mechanisms designed to reduce estimator variance and lower mean squared error. Motivated by this insight, we introduce Logit-Averaged Policy Optimization (LAPO), a KL-free and critic-free post-training framework that replaces explicit KL regularization with logit averaging inside Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO); in particular, averaging the logits of the trainable policy and a frozen reference policy functions as an implicit structural regularizer that stabilizes rollout trajectories. For selecting the mixing weight, we propose a compute-efficient adaptive algorithm that dynamically balances exploration and structural anchoring throughout training, evaluated against a static fixed-weight baseline. This adaptive mechanism eliminates explicit KL penalty backpropagation and expensive, fragile hyperparameter sweeps while reducing the incidence of uninformative zero-reward rollout groups. Mathematically, embedding logit averaging within the reinforcement learning loop operates as an in-training Product of Experts (PoE): the multiplicative geometric mean enables the reference anchor to act as a soft logical "AND" that vetoes non-compliant tokens, enforcing schema rigor and safety guardrails without the catastrophic forgetting typical of sequential fine-tuning. Evaluated across Qwen2.5-Instruct models (1.5B, 3B, and 7B), LAPO consistently outperforms canonical KL-regularized GRPO, achieving a 7%-15% accuracy gain on MATH and a 2%-5% gain on cn_k12 and MMLU. Finally, the resulting mixed teacher policy can be distilled back into a single student network, fully restoring standard $1\times$ inference latency.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗