跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.22897 · v2

From Residuals to Reasons: LLM-Guided Mechanism Inference from Tabular Data

首次提交 2026-05-21 23:34
版本更新 2026-11-07 07:21
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

When software fails, we read the error, form a hypothesis, write a patch, and test it. LLMs now do this for neural networks by editing weights; when a tabular model fails, we usually retune it. Most interpretability methods report which features matter rather than how they combine. Rather than asking an LLM to predict the target over the whole output space, we anchor the prediction with a base model and ask the LLM to debug it. We introduce Multi-Agent Residual In-Context Learning (MARICL), in which LLM agents read high-residual examples, hypothesize the missing structure, and write executable correction terms that are then refined by multi-turn textual gradient optimization. The resulting corrections are readable, executable hypotheses about what the base model misses, rather than validated mechanisms. Across nine benchmarks covering scientific, biomedical, socioeconomic, and synthetic data, MARICL reliably repairs its base model's structured residuals, improving it on every dataset, and on synthetic data absent from pretraining it recovers the hidden structure (two seeds). Against the strongest competing baseline it leads on five of the eight real benchmarks and trails TabPFN on the other three, while adding an inspectable correction that black-box baselines do not provide. Code is available at https://github.com/MrRezaeiUofT/Multi_Agent_Residual_In_Context_Learning.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-07 07:21 · 最新观测版本

From Residuals to Reasons: LLM-Guided Mechanism Inference from Tabular Data

When software fails, we read the error, form a hypothesis, write a patch, and test it. LLMs now do this for neural networks by editing weights; when a tabular model fails, we usually retune it. Most interpretability methods report which features matter rather than how they combine. Rather than asking an LLM to predict the target over the whole output space, we anchor the prediction with a base model and ask the LLM to debug it. We introduce Multi-Agent Residual In-Context Learning (MARICL), in which LLM agents read high-residual examples, hypothesize the missing structure, and write executable correction terms that are then refined by multi-turn textual gradient optimization. The resulting corrections are readable, executable hypotheses about what the base model misses, rather than validated mechanisms. Across nine benchmarks covering scientific, biomedical, socioeconomic, and synthetic data, MARICL reliably repairs its base model's structured residuals, improving it on every dataset, and on synthetic data absent from pretraining it recovers the hidden structure (two seeds). Against the strongest competing baseline it leads on five of the eight real benchmarks and trails TabPFN on the other three, while adding an inspectable correction that black-box baselines do not provide. Code is available at https://github.com/MrRezaeiUofT/Multi_Agent_Residual_In_Context_Learning.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗