跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.28751 · v2

Correctness vs Efficiency: Behavior Control with Weight-Space Extrapolation in Code RL

首次提交 2026-05-28 01:09
版本更新 2026-11-09 23:23
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

A model trained with an imperfect reward in RL may learn to exploit the reward with undesired behavior. We study a controlled form of this problem in competitive programming. A program may pass small tests while violating the intended efficiency requirement on larger inputs. We construct a family of rewards that progressively relax the efficiency constraint, making the reward increasingly easy to exploit, and train separate policies. This sweep reveals a correctness-efficiency frontier. Relaxing the reward leads to less efficient programs and more resource-limit failures. Stricter rewards suppress these failures but increase correctness failures near the model's capability boundary. This frontier is also reflected in weight space. Interpolating between the resulting models reproduces the same behavioral change. More surprisingly, extrapolation in both directions further amplifies or suppresses it beyond the trained checkpoints. Extensive experiments show that this pattern holds across pure reasoning, tool use, and agentic coding, and at both 32B and 7B scales. This suggests a simple intervention for this form of reward hacking: use a loose reward to amplify the undesired behavior, use the weight-space difference to a strict-reward model as its steering vector, and then extrapolate past the strict model to suppress it.

作者备注:Accepted at NeurIPS 2026. Camera-ready version, 54 pages

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-09 23:23 · 最新观测版本

Correctness vs Efficiency: Behavior Control with Weight-Space Extrapolation in Code RL

A model trained with an imperfect reward in RL may learn to exploit the reward with undesired behavior. We study a controlled form of this problem in competitive programming. A program may pass small tests while violating the intended efficiency requirement on larger inputs. We construct a family of rewards that progressively relax the efficiency constraint, making the reward increasingly easy to exploit, and train separate policies. This sweep reveals a correctness-efficiency frontier. Relaxing the reward leads to less efficient programs and more resource-limit failures. Stricter rewards suppress these failures but increase correctness failures near the model's capability boundary. This frontier is also reflected in weight space. Interpolating between the resulting models reproduces the same behavioral change. More surprisingly, extrapolation in both directions further amplifies or suppresses it beyond the trained checkpoints. Extensive experiments show that this pattern holds across pure reasoning, tool use, and agentic coding, and at both 32B and 7B scales. This suggests a simple intervention for this form of reward hacking: use a loose reward to amplify the undesired behavior, use the weight-space difference to a strict-reward model as its steering vector, and then extrapolate past the strict model to suppress it.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗