跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.29172 · v2

Probabilistic adjustment of seasonal forecasts using cVAE with a non-parametric decoder: A case study of Arctic sea ice predictions

首次提交 2026-05-28 07:14
版本更新 2026-10-26 12:57
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:36
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Seasonal climate predictions support planning and risk management by offering early information of the likely climate conditions in the coming months, and associated uncertainties. Ensemble forecasts enable this by simulating many plausible outcomes, allowing predictions to be expressed as usable probabilities. Large ensembles and high-resolution forecasts strengthen this by better sampling uncertainty and capturing finer-scale processes but come with significant computational cost. Moreover, forecast ensembles drift and exhibit systematic biases and spatio-temporal errors that grow with lead time, requiring careful post-processing and calibration. A probabilistic post-processing framework based on conditional Variational Autoencoders (cVAEs) was developed at the Canadian Center for Climate Modeling and Analysis to generate large ensembles of adjusted seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice. The generative model was designed to learn the observational distribution conditioned on the biased model prediction. This enables generation of arbitrarily large ensembles of calibrated, bias corrected forecasts with improved skill. Here, we extend this framework to a Generalized Variational Inference problem to address the loss of fine-scale energy and the characteristic blurriness, a known limitation of standard cVAEs. Specifically, we employ a generator in place of the Gaussian parametrized decoder in cVAE and use Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS) in the objective function instead of the Gaussian log-likelihood. We further use a higher resolution target dataset compared to the raw forecast. We show that the adjusted forecasts are better calibrated, more consistent with the observational distribution, and exhibit smaller errors than benchmark predictions, while also enhancing the resolution of the raw forecasts and improving sharpness and spectral power relative to the standard cVAE.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-26 12:57 · 最新观测版本

Probabilistic adjustment of seasonal forecasts using cVAE with a non-parametric decoder: A case study of Arctic sea ice predictions

Seasonal climate predictions support planning and risk management by offering early information of the likely climate conditions in the coming months, and associated uncertainties. Ensemble forecasts enable this by simulating many plausible outcomes, allowing predictions to be expressed as usable probabilities. Large ensembles and high-resolution forecasts strengthen this by better sampling uncertainty and capturing finer-scale processes but come with significant computational cost. Moreover, forecast ensembles drift and exhibit systematic biases and spatio-temporal errors that grow with lead time, requiring careful post-processing and calibration. A probabilistic post-processing framework based on conditional Variational Autoencoders (cVAEs) was developed at the Canadian Center for Climate Modeling and Analysis to generate large ensembles of adjusted seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice. The generative model was designed to learn the observational distribution conditioned on the biased model prediction. This enables generation of arbitrarily large ensembles of calibrated, bias corrected forecasts with improved skill. Here, we extend this framework to a Generalized Variational Inference problem to address the loss of fine-scale energy and the characteristic blurriness, a known limitation of standard cVAEs. Specifically, we employ a generator in place of the Gaussian parametrized decoder in cVAE and use Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS) in the objective function instead of the Gaussian log-likelihood. We further use a higher resolution target dataset compared to the raw forecast. We show that the adjusted forecasts are better calibrated, more consistent with the observational distribution, and exhibit smaller errors than benchmark predictions, while also enhancing the resolution of the raw forecasts and improving sharpness and spectral power relative to the standard cVAE.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗