跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.30472 · v2

Your Multimodal Speech Model Says I Have a Face for Radio

首次提交 2026-05-29 02:42
版本更新 2026-11-05 22:39
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

As large neural models have become better at language tasks, researchers are increasingly building multi- and omnimodal models that handle more than one modality of data. One example is the expansion of speech recognition models to audio-visual data, the goal being noise mitigation and multimodal subtitling. While performance and bias have been studied extensively in the single-modality regime, it is unknown how new modalities affect this, even though they produce biases in humans. We therefore propose the first bias evaluation of multimodal speech recognition, where we create videos pairing different faces with the same audio using lip-sync, and measure changes in speech transcription accuracy. We find large quality-of-service differences across mWhisper-Flamingo and Gemini models, with drops of up to 4.05 word error rate points, across self-declared gender, ethnicity, and their intersection. Our findings point to a priority for developers to evaluate, fix, and communicate such limitations, as providing more signals through additional modalities is not necessarily better, and may even lead to biased outcomes.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-05 22:39 · 最新观测版本

Your Multimodal Speech Model Says I Have a Face for Radio

As large neural models have become better at language tasks, researchers are increasingly building multi- and omnimodal models that handle more than one modality of data. One example is the expansion of speech recognition models to audio-visual data, the goal being noise mitigation and multimodal subtitling. While performance and bias have been studied extensively in the single-modality regime, it is unknown how new modalities affect this, even though they produce biases in humans. We therefore propose the first bias evaluation of multimodal speech recognition, where we create videos pairing different faces with the same audio using lip-sync, and measure changes in speech transcription accuracy. We find large quality-of-service differences across mWhisper-Flamingo and Gemini models, with drops of up to 4.05 word error rate points, across self-declared gender, ethnicity, and their intersection. Our findings point to a priority for developers to evaluate, fix, and communicate such limitations, as providing more signals through additional modalities is not necessarily better, and may even lead to biased outcomes.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗