跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2606.21755 · v3

RoverDevKit: An open, physics-grounded tradespace toolkit for conceptual design of lunar micro-rovers

首次提交 2026-06-20 05:14
版本更新 2026-11-07 20:48
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The number of planned lunar micro-rovers is increasing, yet few open, benchmarked tools exist to explore trade-offs in their design. Rover sizing is a highly coupled problem with a feedback loop between vehicle mass and mobility: a heavier rover sinks deeper into loose regolith, deeper sinkage increases power demand, more power requires a larger array, and the array adds mass. We present RoverDevKit, an open-source tradespace exploration toolkit with an evaluator that couples a closed-form wheel-soil model with bottom-up mass, solar-power, thermal-survival, and traverse models. The evaluator is fast enough to serve as the fitness function of a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II): a search comprising 3,000 mission evaluations takes under a minute on a single laptop core. We use it to map trade-offs among distance traveled, vehicle mass, and slope capability on mare, polar, highland, and crater-rim missions. The limiting factor varies by mission: energy storage at high latitude, slope traction on loose highland regolith, and traverse range on mare and crater-rim terrain. The wheel-soil model reproduces measured single-wheel drawbar pull from two independent datasets with accuracy consistent with the 20-30% error typically reported for this class of model, and the mass model predicts published 5-50 kg rover masses with median absolute percentage error of 10.5%. A comparison with five published rover designs in the same mass class shows that they lie near the predicted Pareto front.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v3,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-07 20:48 · 最新观测版本

RoverDevKit: An open, physics-grounded tradespace toolkit for conceptual design of lunar micro-rovers

The number of planned lunar micro-rovers is increasing, yet few open, benchmarked tools exist to explore trade-offs in their design. Rover sizing is a highly coupled problem with a feedback loop between vehicle mass and mobility: a heavier rover sinks deeper into loose regolith, deeper sinkage increases power demand, more power requires a larger array, and the array adds mass. We present RoverDevKit, an open-source tradespace exploration toolkit with an evaluator that couples a closed-form wheel-soil model with bottom-up mass, solar-power, thermal-survival, and traverse models. The evaluator is fast enough to serve as the fitness function of a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II): a search comprising 3,000 mission evaluations takes under a minute on a single laptop core. We use it to map trade-offs among distance traveled, vehicle mass, and slope capability on mare, polar, highland, and crater-rim missions. The limiting factor varies by mission: energy storage at high latitude, slope traction on loose highland regolith, and traverse range on mare and crater-rim terrain. The wheel-soil model reproduces measured single-wheel drawbar pull from two independent datasets with accuracy consistent with the 20-30% error typically reported for this class of model, and the mass model predicts published 5-50 kg rover masses with median absolute percentage error of 10.5%. A comparison with five published rover designs in the same mass class shows that they lie near the predicted Pareto front.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗