跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2607.11653 · v2

Bet on Features: Anytime-Valid and Feature-Aware Auditing of Conditional Quantile Forecasters

首次提交 2026-07-13 23:04
版本更新 2026-10-28 16:13
雷达观测 2026-10-30 10:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Black-box conditional quantile forecasts are widely used for sequential decisions under asymmetric costs. Once deployed, such forecasters must be monitored continuously as data streams drift and regimes change; this invalidates standard, fixed-horizon backtests for calibration. Further, existing backtests do not take into account that the notion of calibration is, in fact, information-dependent: forecasts can look calibrated to an auditor with coarse information while being miscalibrated to an auditor with richer information. We develop a distribution-free and game-theoretic testing framework for continuously auditing such forecasters with dependent, potentially nonstationary observations. We first formalize notions of conditional quantile calibration relative to the contextual features available to the auditor, showing how coarser information can limit detection. We then identify detectable alternative classes and, for contextual bets linear in the features, derive finite-time detection guarantees without an i.i.d. assumption. The resulting evidence processes provide interpretable, "feature-aware" evidence for miscalibration. We empirically validate these methods on simulated and real data, finding that a popular time series forecaster (Chronos-2) is highly miscalibrated w.r.t. multiple relevant features.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-28 16:13 · 最新观测版本

Bet on Features: Anytime-Valid and Feature-Aware Auditing of Conditional Quantile Forecasters

Black-box conditional quantile forecasts are widely used for sequential decisions under asymmetric costs. Once deployed, such forecasters must be monitored continuously as data streams drift and regimes change; this invalidates standard, fixed-horizon backtests for calibration. Further, existing backtests do not take into account that the notion of calibration is, in fact, information-dependent: forecasts can look calibrated to an auditor with coarse information while being miscalibrated to an auditor with richer information. We develop a distribution-free and game-theoretic testing framework for continuously auditing such forecasters with dependent, potentially nonstationary observations. We first formalize notions of conditional quantile calibration relative to the contextual features available to the auditor, showing how coarser information can limit detection. We then identify detectable alternative classes and, for contextual bets linear in the features, derive finite-time detection guarantees without an i.i.d. assumption. The resulting evidence processes provide interpretable, "feature-aware" evidence for miscalibration. We empirically validate these methods on simulated and real data, finding that a popular time series forecaster (Chronos-2) is highly miscalibrated w.r.t. multiple relevant features.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗