跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2607.13033 · v2

DenseReward: Dense Reward Learning via Failure Synthesis for Robotic Manipulation

首次提交 2026-07-15 01:59
版本更新 2026-11-05 05:04
雷达观测 2026-11-06 11:06
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Reinforcement learning holds great promise for improving robot policies beyond the limits of imitation learning. However, its practical adoption remains bottlenecked by the lack of reliable vision-language reward models that provide dense and informative feedback. Two key challenges remain: acquiring diverse failure data at scale and obtaining fine-grained reward signals beyond sparse trajectory-level success labels. Existing approaches reuse successful trajectories to construct negative or suboptimal examples through trajectory truncation, instruction relabeling, or trajectory comparisons, without generating new trajectories where physical interaction failures such as collisions, missed grasps, object drops, and recovery actually occur. Meanwhile, many existing reward models predict sparse binary or trajectory-level rewards, which provide limited guidance for efficient policy optimization. We introduce DenseReward, a dense robotic reward model that addresses both challenges. To train DenseReward, we develop an automated failure data generation pipeline that synthesizes physically realistic failure trajectories in simulation without manual annotation, covering diverse failure modes such as collisions, missed grasps, object drops, and recovery behaviors. DenseReward predicts dense frame-level reward scores from visual observations and language instructions, enabling fine-grained estimation of task progress throughout an episode. Experiments show that DenseReward outperforms general-purpose VLMs and existing robotic reward models in dense reward prediction across both simulated and real-world manipulation. We further demonstrate that DenseReward provides effective reward guidance for downstream model predictive control and reinforcement learning.

作者备注:Website: https://dense-reward.github.io/

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-05 05:04 · 最新观测版本

DenseReward: Dense Reward Learning via Failure Synthesis for Robotic Manipulation

Reinforcement learning holds great promise for improving robot policies beyond the limits of imitation learning. However, its practical adoption remains bottlenecked by the lack of reliable vision-language reward models that provide dense and informative feedback. Two key challenges remain: acquiring diverse failure data at scale and obtaining fine-grained reward signals beyond sparse trajectory-level success labels. Existing approaches reuse successful trajectories to construct negative or suboptimal examples through trajectory truncation, instruction relabeling, or trajectory comparisons, without generating new trajectories where physical interaction failures such as collisions, missed grasps, object drops, and recovery actually occur. Meanwhile, many existing reward models predict sparse binary or trajectory-level rewards, which provide limited guidance for efficient policy optimization. We introduce DenseReward, a dense robotic reward model that addresses both challenges. To train DenseReward, we develop an automated failure data generation pipeline that synthesizes physically realistic failure trajectories in simulation without manual annotation, covering diverse failure modes such as collisions, missed grasps, object drops, and recovery behaviors. DenseReward predicts dense frame-level reward scores from visual observations and language instructions, enabling fine-grained estimation of task progress throughout an episode. Experiments show that DenseReward outperforms general-purpose VLMs and existing robotic reward models in dense reward prediction across both simulated and real-world manipulation. We further demonstrate that DenseReward provides effective reward guidance for downstream model predictive control and reinforcement learning.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗