跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2607.23085 · v2

Common-Neighbor-Count-Based Representative Possible World Finding on Uncertain Graphs

首次提交 2026-07-25 15:27
版本更新 2026-11-12 11:12
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Given an uncertain graph G\mathcal{G} with probabilistic edges, a representative possible world (RPW) is a deterministic graph that closely preserves the expected value of a designated basic structural feature in G\mathcal{G}. As a proxy for G\mathcal{G}, the RPW allows us to directly obtain approximate expectations of the higher-order features related to this preserved basic feature, thereby avoiding expensive enumeration or sampling on G\mathcal{G}. Existing RPWs preserve per-node features such as degree and triangle degree but overlook common-neighbor counts between node pairs. As a result, they may poorly approximate the expected values of higher-order features that depend on these counts, e.g., Jaccard coefficient. Therefore, we study the \underline{C}ommon-neighbor-count-based \underline{R}epresentative \underline{P}ossible \underline{W}orld (CRPW) problem, extending RPWs from node features to node-pair features. Our problem seeks the possible world that best preserves the expected numbers of common neighbors between node pairs, and we prove that it is NP-hard. To address it, we develop a two-stage basic algorithm that quickly initializes a possible world and then refines it iteratively. We next accelerate the refinement with a counting-based estimation, as the refinement only requires determining whether an edge state change to the possible world is beneficial, rather than computing its exact magnitude. Furthermore, we design a Beta distribution-based adaptive termination method to automatically stop the refinement once the desired quality of the possible world is reached, preventing over- or under-execution. Extensive experiments on five real-world uncertain graphs demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithms in preserving structural features.

作者备注:Full version; 16 pages, 15 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-12 11:12 · 最新观测版本

Common-Neighbor-Count-Based Representative Possible World Finding on Uncertain Graphs

Given an uncertain graph G\mathcal{G} with probabilistic edges, a representative possible world (RPW) is a deterministic graph that closely preserves the expected value of a designated basic structural feature in G\mathcal{G}. As a proxy for G\mathcal{G}, the RPW allows us to directly obtain approximate expectations of the higher-order features related to this preserved basic feature, thereby avoiding expensive enumeration or sampling on G\mathcal{G}. Existing RPWs preserve per-node features such as degree and triangle degree but overlook common-neighbor counts between node pairs. As a result, they may poorly approximate the expected values of higher-order features that depend on these counts, e.g., Jaccard coefficient. Therefore, we study the \underline{C}ommon-neighbor-count-based \underline{R}epresentative \underline{P}ossible \underline{W}orld (CRPW) problem, extending RPWs from node features to node-pair features. Our problem seeks the possible world that best preserves the expected numbers of common neighbors between node pairs, and we prove that it is NP-hard. To address it, we develop a two-stage basic algorithm that quickly initializes a possible world and then refines it iteratively. We next accelerate the refinement with a counting-based estimation, as the refinement only requires determining whether an edge state change to the possible world is beneficial, rather than computing its exact magnitude. Furthermore, we design a Beta distribution-based adaptive termination method to automatically stop the refinement once the desired quality of the possible world is reached, preventing over- or under-execution. Extensive experiments on five real-world uncertain graphs demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithms in preserving structural features.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗