跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2607.25875 · v5

EvoST: Adapting Traffic Forecasters to Evolving Sensor Graphs

首次提交 2026-07-28 23:38
版本更新 2026-11-07 13:54
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Web-based navigation and traffic information services depend on accurate forecasts as sensor networks evolve. On checkpoints reused years later, updating only shared weights or adding a low-rank node prompt leaves substantial degradation, whereas, in the evaluated architectures, refreshing node identities recovers most of it while the shared spatio-temporal weights are reused. We propose EvoST, a framework that maintains traffic forecasters by refreshing node identities while keeping shared weights fixed. EvoST updates existing identities using recently released labels and initializes new sensors with identities borrowed from behaviorally similar established sensors. Once enough delayed labels arrive, it jointly refits all identities, and a per-sensor recursive least-squares calibrator corrects forecasts as labels become available. Across twelve PeMS region-year settings, identity refresh reduces the relative one-hour MAE gap between five-year-old STAEFormer checkpoints and target-year models from 17.7% to 2.5%, with all forecasters calibrated, and its MAE is 0.7% above that of full-parameter fine-tuning on the same data. In Graph WaveNet, identity refresh recovers 88% of the five-year MAE gap to calibrated target-year models. Similar recovery holds for STAEFormer checkpoints up to fifteen years old, while refreshing STID recovers 67% of its five-year gap. On an annual benchmark covering nine EvoXXLTraffic districts and Transport for NSW, EvoST has the lowest average MAE, RMSE, and MAPE among the reported non-foundation methods on all ten networks, and calibration accounts for most of its Avg-MAE reduction from the matched frozen checkpoints. Code and the extended version: https://github.com/lixus7/EvoST

作者备注:Under Review

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v5 · 2026-11-07 13:54 · 最新观测版本

EvoST: Adapting Traffic Forecasters to Evolving Sensor Graphs

Web-based navigation and traffic information services depend on accurate forecasts as sensor networks evolve. On checkpoints reused years later, updating only shared weights or adding a low-rank node prompt leaves substantial degradation, whereas, in the evaluated architectures, refreshing node identities recovers most of it while the shared spatio-temporal weights are reused. We propose EvoST, a framework that maintains traffic forecasters by refreshing node identities while keeping shared weights fixed. EvoST updates existing identities using recently released labels and initializes new sensors with identities borrowed from behaviorally similar established sensors. Once enough delayed labels arrive, it jointly refits all identities, and a per-sensor recursive least-squares calibrator corrects forecasts as labels become available. Across twelve PeMS region-year settings, identity refresh reduces the relative one-hour MAE gap between five-year-old STAEFormer checkpoints and target-year models from 17.7% to 2.5%, with all forecasters calibrated, and its MAE is 0.7% above that of full-parameter fine-tuning on the same data. In Graph WaveNet, identity refresh recovers 88% of the five-year MAE gap to calibrated target-year models. Similar recovery holds for STAEFormer checkpoints up to fifteen years old, while refreshing STID recovers 67% of its five-year gap. On an annual benchmark covering nine EvoXXLTraffic districts and Transport for NSW, EvoST has the lowest average MAE, RMSE, and MAPE among the reported non-foundation methods on all ten networks, and calibration accounts for most of its Avg-MAE reduction from the matched frozen checkpoints. Code and the extended version: https://github.com/lixus7/EvoST

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗