跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2607.26409 · v2

Can We Trust AI in 6G? Verifiable and Auditable AI-Driven Trustworthy Wireless Networks

首次提交 2026-07-29 10:42
版本更新 2026-10-26 21:15
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:36
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Mobile network operators are increasingly exploring the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to automate network tasks such as cell selection and mobility management. Current assurance methods for these AI functions are forms of output testing. They check what a function decides, but they cannot show why it decided that way, and two functions can pass the same tests for different reasons. In this paper, we propose mechanistic auditing, which inspects the internal features of an AI function and checks them against machine-verifiable 3GPP specifications. We set out a three-step auditing principle that locates protocol-relevant features, verifies whether decisions depend on them, and audits each decision against them. We then present an audit-native network architecture. In this architecture, a dedicated verification agent certifies each AI function before deployment and audits its decisions during operation. In a case study on a language model for LTE signalling, we find internal features that carry the 3GPP handover concepts. Removing them lowers the model's accuracy on handover tasks from 96% to 0%, while removing the same number of random features changes its accuracy by less than two points. An audit of a handover decision can therefore check whether these features are active when the model makes that decision. We also discuss the open challenges that remain before mechanistic auditing can enter telecommunications practice and standardisation.

作者备注:Submitted for possible journal publication

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-26 21:15 · 最新观测版本

Can We Trust AI in 6G? Verifiable and Auditable AI-Driven Trustworthy Wireless Networks

Mobile network operators are increasingly exploring the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to automate network tasks such as cell selection and mobility management. Current assurance methods for these AI functions are forms of output testing. They check what a function decides, but they cannot show why it decided that way, and two functions can pass the same tests for different reasons. In this paper, we propose mechanistic auditing, which inspects the internal features of an AI function and checks them against machine-verifiable 3GPP specifications. We set out a three-step auditing principle that locates protocol-relevant features, verifies whether decisions depend on them, and audits each decision against them. We then present an audit-native network architecture. In this architecture, a dedicated verification agent certifies each AI function before deployment and audits its decisions during operation. In a case study on a language model for LTE signalling, we find internal features that carry the 3GPP handover concepts. Removing them lowers the model's accuracy on handover tasks from 96% to 0%, while removing the same number of random features changes its accuracy by less than two points. An audit of a handover decision can therefore check whether these features are active when the model makes that decision. We also discuss the open challenges that remain before mechanistic auditing can enter telecommunications practice and standardisation.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗