← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2607.28093 · v2
Meteosat Third Generation imagery improves CNN-based SSI retrieval
首次提交 2026-07-30 20:05
版本更新 2026-11-09 16:18
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:18
摘要
Accurate Surface Solar Irradiance (SSI) estimation is increasingly important for photovoltaic energy monitoring and forecasting. The recently introduced Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) satellite constellation provides imaging data with higher spatial resolution compared to the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) satellite constellation, but its benefits for machine-learning-based SSI retrieval are not well established. We compare multi-resolution convolutional neural network models for 10-minute SSI retrieval over Northern Europe (Estonia) using either MSG/SEVIRI or MTG/FCI satellite imagery. We evaluate model performance against ground-based pyranometer measurements from eight Estonian meteorological stations using site-based cross-validation with a temporally independent test year and multiple training seeds. Model performance is also compared with the SARAH-3 physics-based satellite SSI product. The FCI-only model significantly outperformed the SEVIRI-only model under overcast and cloudy conditions, reducing RMSE by 5.1 W/m^2 and 6.5 W/m^2, respectively. However, under partly cloudy or clear skies, there was no statistically significant difference in RMSE between the FCI-only and the SEVIRI-only models. In all-sky conditions, the RMSE of the FCI-only model was 5.1 W/m^2 lower on average, but this difference was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Compared with physics-based SARAH-3, the FCI-only model yielded skill scores of 28% under overcast conditions, 19% under cloudy conditions, and 17% overall. Furthermore, both models underperformed SARAH-3 in clear-sky conditions. These results show that higher-resolution MTG/FCI imagery improves CNN-based SSI retrieval when clouds dominate irradiance variability, but also indicate that higher resolution alone is insufficient to address clear-sky limitations in machine-learning-based SSI retrieval.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-11-09 16:18 · 最新观测版本
Meteosat Third Generation imagery improves CNN-based SSI retrieval
Accurate Surface Solar Irradiance (SSI) estimation is increasingly important for photovoltaic energy monitoring and forecasting. The recently introduced Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) satellite constellation provides imaging data with higher spatial resolution compared to the Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) satellite constellation, but its benefits for machine-learning-based SSI retrieval are not well established. We compare multi-resolution convolutional neural network models for 10-minute SSI retrieval over Northern Europe (Estonia) using either MSG/SEVIRI or MTG/FCI satellite imagery. We evaluate model performance against ground-based pyranometer measurements from eight Estonian meteorological stations using site-based cross-validation with a temporally independent test year and multiple training seeds. Model performance is also compared with the SARAH-3 physics-based satellite SSI product. The FCI-only model significantly outperformed the SEVIRI-only model under overcast and cloudy conditions, reducing RMSE by 5.1 W/m^2 and 6.5 W/m^2, respectively. However, under partly cloudy or clear skies, there was no statistically significant difference in RMSE between the FCI-only and the SEVIRI-only models. In all-sky conditions, the RMSE of the FCI-only model was 5.1 W/m^2 lower on average, but this difference was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. Compared with physics-based SARAH-3, the FCI-only model yielded skill scores of 28% under overcast conditions, 19% under cloudy conditions, and 17% overall. Furthermore, both models underperformed SARAH-3 in clear-sky conditions. These results show that higher-resolution MTG/FCI imagery improves CNN-based SSI retrieval when clouds dominate irradiance variability, but also indicate that higher resolution alone is insufficient to address clear-sky limitations in machine-learning-based SSI retrieval.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗