跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2608.10288 · v2

Power law graph attention: exact generalization of scaled dot-product attention, empirical collapse at inference

首次提交 2026-08-11 06:45
版本更新 2026-11-04 02:11
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The Large Language Model from Power Law Decoder Representations (PLDR-LLM) and its attention, Power Law Graph Attention (PLGA), replace the fixed bilinear form of scaled dot-product attention (SDPA) with a learned, input-generated bilinear operator $G_{\mathrm{LM}}$, built from a positive tensor $A_{\mathrm{LM}}$ by elementwise power laws. The architecture is fully specified, verified against pinned reference releases; claims are labeled theorem, conditional theorem, measurement, or conjecture. Unconditionally: PLGA contains SDPA exactly at $G_{\mathrm{LM}}=I$; $A_{\mathrm{LM}}$ and $A_{P}$ are strictly entrywise positive, with Perron-Frobenius structure on $A_{\mathrm{LM}}$; the DAG regularizer has the NOTEARS walk-counting form and positivity obstructs exact acyclicity; and, under nonresonance (satisfied by standard rotary frequencies), a commutant criterion identifies which operators preserve relative-position dependence. An inference-collapse theorem: exact input invariance of the head score operators $G_{\mathrm{LM}}$ collapses inference to generalized SDPA with a constant operator per head. Measured invariance: relative fluctuations of $10^{-6}$ and below; perturbation bounds quantify but do not certify cached inference; the assembled proxy misses the decoding margin. A conditional three-stage mechanism (rotary twirl, concentration, row-map contraction) is measured on a released checkpoint. Blockwise training and scoring under the global Gram are stated with explicit target exposure; on tested samples, block and sequential scoring select identical answers and agree on the published TruthfulQA probability-mass metric within $5\times10^{-5}$ per item. Self-organized criticality enters as a phenomenological framework with an intrinsic order parameter; open claims become falsifiable conjectures. Selected proof cores are machine-checked in Lean 4.

作者备注:66 pages, 1 figure, 8 tables. Revised with clarifications and improvements to content and presentation based on the published book "Power Law Graph Attention and PLDR-LLMs: Mathematical Foundations, Training Dynamics, and Predictive Inference" (2026), which incorporates this manuscript

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

PLDR-LLM 的幂律图注意力(PLGA)在理论上精确包含缩放点积注意力(SDPA),但作者报告其头评分算子在推理时趋于输入不变,导致推理坍缩为每头使用常数算子的广义 SDPA。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-04 02:11 · 最新观测版本

Power law graph attention: exact generalization of scaled dot-product attention, empirical collapse at inference

The Large Language Model from Power Law Decoder Representations (PLDR-LLM) and its attention, Power Law Graph Attention (PLGA), replace the fixed bilinear form of scaled dot-product attention (SDPA) with a learned, input-generated bilinear operator $G_{\mathrm{LM}}$, built from a positive tensor $A_{\mathrm{LM}}$ by elementwise power laws. The architecture is fully specified, verified against pinned reference releases; claims are labeled theorem, conditional theorem, measurement, or conjecture. Unconditionally: PLGA contains SDPA exactly at $G_{\mathrm{LM}}=I$; $A_{\mathrm{LM}}$ and $A_{P}$ are strictly entrywise positive, with Perron-Frobenius structure on $A_{\mathrm{LM}}$; the DAG regularizer has the NOTEARS walk-counting form and positivity obstructs exact acyclicity; and, under nonresonance (satisfied by standard rotary frequencies), a commutant criterion identifies which operators preserve relative-position dependence. An inference-collapse theorem: exact input invariance of the head score operators $G_{\mathrm{LM}}$ collapses inference to generalized SDPA with a constant operator per head. Measured invariance: relative fluctuations of $10^{-6}$ and below; perturbation bounds quantify but do not certify cached inference; the assembled proxy misses the decoding margin. A conditional three-stage mechanism (rotary twirl, concentration, row-map contraction) is measured on a released checkpoint. Blockwise training and scoring under the global Gram are stated with explicit target exposure; on tested samples, block and sequential scoring select identical answers and agree on the published TruthfulQA probability-mass metric within $5\times10^{-5}$ per item. Self-organized criticality enters as a phenomenological framework with an intrinsic order parameter; open claims become falsifiable conjectures. Selected proof cores are machine-checked in Lean 4.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗