← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2608.12206 · v3
Exponential Lower Bounds for Horn Amalgamation
首次提交 2026-08-13 00:01
版本更新 2026-11-09 22:48
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
摘要
The amalgamation decision problem asks whether the finite models of a given universal first-order sentence have the amalgamation property. We prove that this problem is ExpTime-hard for universal Horn sentences of maximum relation arity three, and 2ExpTime-hard when the arity is unbounded, thereby strengthening the previous best lower bounds for universal Horn sentences. The first reduction simulates runs of nondeterministic tree automata using a single ternary relation and unary and binary auxiliary relations. The second simulates finite winning strategies in an exponential corridor game. As a secondary contribution, we prove that deciding the winner remains 2ExpTime-complete for the game normal form used in our reduction, in which each move label determines a unique legal successor from every non-winning legal row.
作者备注:The upper-bound claims in v2 have been withdrawn due to an error in the proof. This version focuses on the new lower bounds
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v3 · 2026-11-09 22:48 · 最新观测版本
Exponential Lower Bounds for Horn Amalgamation
The amalgamation decision problem asks whether the finite models of a given universal first-order sentence have the amalgamation property. We prove that this problem is ExpTime-hard for universal Horn sentences of maximum relation arity three, and 2ExpTime-hard when the arity is unbounded, thereby strengthening the previous best lower bounds for universal Horn sentences. The first reduction simulates runs of nondeterministic tree automata using a single ternary relation and unary and binary auxiliary relations. The second simulates finite winning strategies in an exponential corridor game. As a secondary contribution, we prove that deciding the winner remains 2ExpTime-complete for the game normal form used in our reduction, in which each move label determines a unique legal successor from every non-winning legal row.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗