跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.14448 · v2

NeuroActiSep: Detecting Factual Hallucinations from Feed-Forward Neurons in a Single Pass

首次提交 2026-09-13 19:42
版本更新 2026-11-08 15:53
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Hallucination in large language models reduces their reliability and slows adoption. Various white-box studies have used internal representations to detect patterns of truthfulness and factuality. A less-studied approach is to identify feed-forward neurons correlated with hallucination. In this empirical study, we propose a method to rank feed-forward neurons at the final prompt token and use it to investigate the feasibility of utilizing them for hallucination detection in the first forward pass. Using a neuron selection dataset built from CounterFact for identifying neurons correlated with hallucination, we transfer the selected neuron identities to train hallucination classifiers on other factual question-answering datasets. Our work provides empirical evidence that probes trained using the features from sparse sets of selected neurons perform on par with probes trained on internal representations. We also analyze the distribution of selected neurons and the effects of layer depth and neuron budget on detection performance. Our results show that randomly drawn neuron sets are also competitive at larger budgets, suggesting that signals correlated with hallucination are distributed across many neurons, while selection can help in extremely sparse sets.

作者备注:Major revision: expanded ablation studies, control experiments, and discussion. 10 pages, 4 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-08 15:53 · 最新观测版本

NeuroActiSep: Detecting Factual Hallucinations from Feed-Forward Neurons in a Single Pass

Hallucination in large language models reduces their reliability and slows adoption. Various white-box studies have used internal representations to detect patterns of truthfulness and factuality. A less-studied approach is to identify feed-forward neurons correlated with hallucination. In this empirical study, we propose a method to rank feed-forward neurons at the final prompt token and use it to investigate the feasibility of utilizing them for hallucination detection in the first forward pass. Using a neuron selection dataset built from CounterFact for identifying neurons correlated with hallucination, we transfer the selected neuron identities to train hallucination classifiers on other factual question-answering datasets. Our work provides empirical evidence that probes trained using the features from sparse sets of selected neurons perform on par with probes trained on internal representations. We also analyze the distribution of selected neurons and the effects of layer depth and neuron budget on detection performance. Our results show that randomly drawn neuron sets are also competitive at larger budgets, suggesting that signals correlated with hallucination are distributed across many neurons, while selection can help in extremely sparse sets.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗