← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2609.18482 · v2
Real-Time Bounded Catenary Solver for UAV Tether Modeling
首次提交 2026-09-16 19:12
版本更新 2026-11-03 22:58
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
摘要
For non-stationary tethered multirotor UAVs in real-world conditions, simulating the forces imposed on the drone by the aerodynamic drag of the tether becomes crucial, with online use cases placing a hard bound on the maximum solve time. In previous work, a quasi-analytical catenary tether model reached a mean solve time of 0.51 ms using a general-purpose root finder, but without any worst-case guarantees or proven convergence. In this work, we reformulate the inner solver by reducing the catenary boundary-value problem to a single transcendental equation in one well-conditioned unknown. We derive a closed-form bracket and prove monotonicity and convexity as well as existence and uniqueness of the root, which together guarantee convergence of the solver. We further propose a two-regime initial guess which approximates the true root within 3.4 % and reduces the mean iteration count by 69.2 % to 2.24 compared to the textbook initialization. Building on the hybrid root-finding method rtsafe (Newton-Raphson with bisection fallback giving bounded iteration counts), we implement a specialized variant that exploits the problem structure to omit unnecessary checks while retaining correctness, which gives up to 1.37 times speedup. With the proposed solver the full tether model achieves a nearly constant solve time of 4.0 us on average and 4.6 us at worst, a 68 times speedup over an optimized re-implementation of the previous method, while agreeing with it to a relative deviation of 8.7e-9. Because the reformulation leaves the underlying physical model untouched, the experimental validation of the previous work carries over unchanged. We further demonstrate its suitability for embedded, resource-constrained platforms with a Lua implementation running directly in ArduPilot on a drone's flight controller, where it stays well inside the scheduling budget with a mean solve time of 0.74 ms.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-11-03 22:58 · 最新观测版本
Real-Time Bounded Catenary Solver for UAV Tether Modeling
For non-stationary tethered multirotor UAVs in real-world conditions, simulating the forces imposed on the drone by the aerodynamic drag of the tether becomes crucial, with online use cases placing a hard bound on the maximum solve time. In previous work, a quasi-analytical catenary tether model reached a mean solve time of 0.51 ms using a general-purpose root finder, but without any worst-case guarantees or proven convergence. In this work, we reformulate the inner solver by reducing the catenary boundary-value problem to a single transcendental equation in one well-conditioned unknown. We derive a closed-form bracket and prove monotonicity and convexity as well as existence and uniqueness of the root, which together guarantee convergence of the solver. We further propose a two-regime initial guess which approximates the true root within 3.4 % and reduces the mean iteration count by 69.2 % to 2.24 compared to the textbook initialization. Building on the hybrid root-finding method rtsafe (Newton-Raphson with bisection fallback giving bounded iteration counts), we implement a specialized variant that exploits the problem structure to omit unnecessary checks while retaining correctness, which gives up to 1.37 times speedup. With the proposed solver the full tether model achieves a nearly constant solve time of 4.0 us on average and 4.6 us at worst, a 68 times speedup over an optimized re-implementation of the previous method, while agreeing with it to a relative deviation of 8.7e-9. Because the reformulation leaves the underlying physical model untouched, the experimental validation of the previous work carries over unchanged. We further demonstrate its suitability for embedded, resource-constrained platforms with a Lua implementation running directly in ArduPilot on a drone's flight controller, where it stays well inside the scheduling budget with a mean solve time of 0.74 ms.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗