跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.27110 · v2

Undertone: Personalizing Frozen VLM Aesthetic Judges from Few Ratings

首次提交 2026-09-23 06:07
版本更新 2026-11-05 08:33
雷达观测 2026-11-06 11:06
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Image quality assessment predicts a mean opinion score (MOS), but for image aesthetics the mean hides the individual, so personalized assessment must start from the few images a new user rates. Fitting each person from scratch fails with ten ratings; networks fine-tuned per person carry over poorly to new kinds of images. We present Undertone-P, which learns from other raters a Gaussian prior over per-person regression weights on read-outs of frozen vision-language model (VLM) judges: the probability-weighted rating and the hidden state at the score token. Since people differ from the crowd in ways other raters reveal, a few ratings need only choose among those ways: a new user costs one closed-form solve, and no network is trained. On Ryu and Yanaka's PARA benchmark, the prior alone reaches a Spearman correlation of .640, above the best published 10- and 100-rating results (.581 and .620); 10 and 100 of a person's ratings raise it to .648 and .676. These ratings add most where tastes depart from the crowd: with 100 ratings, +.067 for the raters who agree least with it and +.206 on LAPIS artworks, against +.037 overall. Without labels, the judges' expected scores predict PARA's MOS at .835 (best published model we ran: .694). PARA-trained networks still lead under PARA's original protocol, likely through a stronger end-to-end MOS model.

作者备注:v2: substantially revised and retitled; supersedes v1 ("Feed the Panel Dimensions, Not Verdicts: Rubric-Decomposed Fusion of Vision-Language Aesthetic Judges"). 4 pages + references, 2 figures, 2 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-05 08:33 · 最新观测版本

Undertone: Personalizing Frozen VLM Aesthetic Judges from Few Ratings

Image quality assessment predicts a mean opinion score (MOS), but for image aesthetics the mean hides the individual, so personalized assessment must start from the few images a new user rates. Fitting each person from scratch fails with ten ratings; networks fine-tuned per person carry over poorly to new kinds of images. We present Undertone-P, which learns from other raters a Gaussian prior over per-person regression weights on read-outs of frozen vision-language model (VLM) judges: the probability-weighted rating and the hidden state at the score token. Since people differ from the crowd in ways other raters reveal, a few ratings need only choose among those ways: a new user costs one closed-form solve, and no network is trained. On Ryu and Yanaka's PARA benchmark, the prior alone reaches a Spearman correlation of .640, above the best published 10- and 100-rating results (.581 and .620); 10 and 100 of a person's ratings raise it to .648 and .676. These ratings add most where tastes depart from the crowd: with 100 ratings, +.067 for the raters who agree least with it and +.206 on LAPIS artworks, against +.037 overall. Without labels, the judges' expected scores predict PARA's MOS at .835 (best published model we ran: .694). PARA-trained networks still lead under PARA's original protocol, likely through a stronger end-to-end MOS model.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗