跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.38437 · v2

Embodiment-aware control by inference over the operator: a simulation study

基于对操作者推断的具身感知控制:一项仿真研究

首次提交 2026-09-30 03:28
版本更新 2026-11-11 01:03
雷达观测 2026-11-11 13:07
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Teleoperation and assistive devices are tuned for channel fidelity, while whether the operator experiences the device as part of the body, the Sense of Embodiment, is measured only afterwards. Minimizing the mismatch between the operator's predictions and the returned feedback fails twice: the predictions cannot be observed, and removing feedback minimizes the objective. We formulate an embodiment-aware controller that instead infers the operator's embodiment and visuo-proprioceptive cue weighting from implicit gaze and pupil signals and task outcome, and chooses bounded device settings under explicit preferences, cast as a discrete Active Inference agent. In simulations with heterogeneous synthetic operators, it raised embodiment from 0.76 to 1.66 on a 0-2 scale over the best fixed setting, within 0.02 of an oracle across ten random seeds; adaptation that did not read the operator gained nothing, and a prediction-error minimizer withheld feedback. An expected-utility controller with the same inference did as well, so the benefit comes from inference over the operator with explicit preferences, not from information seeking. Rules on a single signal came close when that signal was informative and failed when it was not; the controller degraded less, but failed when it trusted an uninformative signal unless briefly calibrated. Against published human data, the model reproduced the embodiment-performance relation, and embodiment developed on a plausible time scale. The embodiment signals were redundant when task success tracked embodiment and became the controller's objective when it did not. Studies with people must first establish calibrated cue-weighting signals and effort-independent embodiment signals.

作者备注:This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible. 20 pages, 4 figures, 7 tables. Code and data: https://github.com/sa-falcone/uee-embodiment-sim (doi:10.5281/zenodo.24106761)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

提出一种具身感知控制器,通过隐式注视与瞳孔信号推断操作者的具身感及视-本体感觉线索权重,在显式偏好下选择有界设备设置,并在合成操作者仿真中评估。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-11 01:03 · 最新观测版本

Embodiment-aware control by inference over the operator: a simulation study

Teleoperation and assistive devices are tuned for channel fidelity, while whether the operator experiences the device as part of the body, the Sense of Embodiment, is measured only afterwards. Minimizing the mismatch between the operator's predictions and the returned feedback fails twice: the predictions cannot be observed, and removing feedback minimizes the objective. We formulate an embodiment-aware controller that instead infers the operator's embodiment and visuo-proprioceptive cue weighting from implicit gaze and pupil signals and task outcome, and chooses bounded device settings under explicit preferences, cast as a discrete Active Inference agent. In simulations with heterogeneous synthetic operators, it raised embodiment from 0.76 to 1.66 on a 0-2 scale over the best fixed setting, within 0.02 of an oracle across ten random seeds; adaptation that did not read the operator gained nothing, and a prediction-error minimizer withheld feedback. An expected-utility controller with the same inference did as well, so the benefit comes from inference over the operator with explicit preferences, not from information seeking. Rules on a single signal came close when that signal was informative and failed when it was not; the controller degraded less, but failed when it trusted an uninformative signal unless briefly calibrated. Against published human data, the model reproduced the embodiment-performance relation, and embodiment developed on a plausible time scale. The embodiment signals were redundant when task success tracked embodiment and became the controller's objective when it did not. Studies with people must first establish calibrated cue-weighting signals and effort-independent embodiment signals.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗