跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.11522 · v2

A joint error metric for scoring CFD against wind tunnel data, scaled by the robust spread of the participants (AutoCFD5 Case 2)

首次提交 2026-10-08 16:54
版本更新 2026-11-12 20:38
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Case 2 of the 5th Automotive CFD Prediction Workshop (AutoCFD5) compares the participants' CFD results with wind tunnel measurements of surface pressure, velocity profiles and force coefficients. To place each run on a diagram of error against computational cost, these quantities must be combined into one number. This note defines that number, the joint error. Following the practice of interlaboratory proficiency testing (ISO 13528), every deviation from the experiment is expressed in units of the spread of the participants' results at that point, estimated robustly with the standard's Algorithm A. The point-wise spreads are pooled into one scale per component, so that every measurement point carries equal weight within its component. Configurations 2a and 2b share these scales and are compared only on the measurements both have, so that their errors can be shown on one diagram. The joint error is a fixed weighted sum of five component errors. The scales are computed once from all AutoCFD5 submissions received by 28 October 2026 and then frozen, so that scores are reproducible and comparable across workshops.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-12 20:38 · 最新观测版本

A joint error metric for scoring CFD against wind tunnel data, scaled by the robust spread of the participants (AutoCFD5 Case 2)

Case 2 of the 5th Automotive CFD Prediction Workshop (AutoCFD5) compares the participants' CFD results with wind tunnel measurements of surface pressure, velocity profiles and force coefficients. To place each run on a diagram of error against computational cost, these quantities must be combined into one number. This note defines that number, the joint error. Following the practice of interlaboratory proficiency testing (ISO 13528), every deviation from the experiment is expressed in units of the spread of the participants' results at that point, estimated robustly with the standard's Algorithm A. The point-wise spreads are pooled into one scale per component, so that every measurement point carries equal weight within its component. Configurations 2a and 2b share these scales and are compared only on the measurements both have, so that their errors can be shown on one diagram. The joint error is a fixed weighted sum of five component errors. The scales are computed once from all AutoCFD5 submissions received by 28 October 2026 and then frozen, so that scores are reproducible and comparable across workshops.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗