← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.14517 · v2
We Have Been Interpreting Diffusion Transformer Backbone Behaviors Wrong
首次提交 2026-10-10 11:26
版本更新 2026-11-05 15:55
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
摘要
During a network forward call, diffusion backbones naturally produce many intermediate activations. If we evaluate each activation against an identical downstream benchmarking protocol, we can plot an inverted-U-shaped curve as the depth profile: the activation's performance goes up first and then down as we go into deeper layers. This profile suggests there is a semantically meaningful signal within the backbone, and it is changing. This is common knowledge in the diffusion model community, which inspires many applications including the widely-adopted REPA. However, the common interpretation of this depth profile may be inaccurate and incomplete: (i) The cause of this curve has long been treated as signal granularity changing from coarse to fine, but there has been little evidence in DiT backbones. (ii) The community has been mainly studying this phenomenon in a static way, without investigating how it changes across different training setups. In this work, we show a different mechanism picture for the profile, where the prediction target (e.g., $ε$, $u$, $x_0$) sits at the center. The semantically meaningful signal is only an intermediate by-product for predicting the target, while the prediction target is the real goal for the backbone. Furthermore, the choice of prediction targets as part of the training setup can predictably affect the curve's shape. With this updated interpretation, many applications of this depth profile can be better grounded and predicted. As an example, we show how to predict the near-optimal placement of REPA based on the prediction target of the training setup. The code is at https://github.com/Darkbblue/dit-compare.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-11-05 15:55 · 最新观测版本
We Have Been Interpreting Diffusion Transformer Backbone Behaviors Wrong
During a network forward call, diffusion backbones naturally produce many intermediate activations. If we evaluate each activation against an identical downstream benchmarking protocol, we can plot an inverted-U-shaped curve as the depth profile: the activation's performance goes up first and then down as we go into deeper layers. This profile suggests there is a semantically meaningful signal within the backbone, and it is changing. This is common knowledge in the diffusion model community, which inspires many applications including the widely-adopted REPA. However, the common interpretation of this depth profile may be inaccurate and incomplete: (i) The cause of this curve has long been treated as signal granularity changing from coarse to fine, but there has been little evidence in DiT backbones. (ii) The community has been mainly studying this phenomenon in a static way, without investigating how it changes across different training setups. In this work, we show a different mechanism picture for the profile, where the prediction target (e.g., $ε$, $u$, $x_0$) sits at the center. The semantically meaningful signal is only an intermediate by-product for predicting the target, while the prediction target is the real goal for the backbone. Furthermore, the choice of prediction targets as part of the training setup can predictably affect the curve's shape. With this updated interpretation, many applications of this depth profile can be better grounded and predicted. As an example, we show how to predict the near-optimal placement of REPA based on the prediction target of the training setup. The code is at https://github.com/Darkbblue/dit-compare.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗