← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.19148 · v3
Program Learning with Verifiable Rewards: Distilling Expert Traces into Programs
首次提交 2026-10-14 04:12
版本更新 2026-11-12 08:38
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:16
摘要
Small language models struggle with tool-use tasks that require following multi-step procedures. Whether these failures reflect limited capability or missing procedural knowledge remains unclear. We introduce Program Learning with Verifiable Rewards (PLVR), which distils expert traces into reusable programs without updating model weights. Frontier models turn recurring operations in the traces into typed primitives and rules, and search assembles them using reference actions and training-task checks. A small frozen model executes the primitives, with deterministic verifiers checking their outputs. The resulting program guides a student's reasoning or checks its proposed actions. We evaluate the same program across students on -Bench Retail and Telecom and LiveMCPBench, using synthetic training tasks and unseen benchmark test tasks. On Telecom, PLVR raises an 8B model's success rate from 43.0% to 91.2%, while larger students reach up to 94.4%, compared with 57.9% for the best baseline. On Retail and LiveMCPBench, PLVR is competitive with the best baselines, although tool search remains more dependent on the student model. These results support program learning as a way to transfer expert procedures across frozen models, trading additional inference computation for more reliable tool use.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v3 · 2026-11-12 08:38 · 最新观测版本
Program Learning with Verifiable Rewards: Distilling Expert Traces into Programs
Small language models struggle with tool-use tasks that require following multi-step procedures. Whether these failures reflect limited capability or missing procedural knowledge remains unclear. We introduce Program Learning with Verifiable Rewards (PLVR), which distils expert traces into reusable programs without updating model weights. Frontier models turn recurring operations in the traces into typed primitives and rules, and search assembles them using reference actions and training-task checks. A small frozen model executes the primitives, with deterministic verifiers checking their outputs. The resulting program guides a student's reasoning or checks its proposed actions. We evaluate the same program across students on -Bench Retail and Telecom and LiveMCPBench, using synthetic training tasks and unseen benchmark test tasks. On Telecom, PLVR raises an 8B model's success rate from 43.0% to 91.2%, while larger students reach up to 94.4%, compared with 57.9% for the best baseline. On Retail and LiveMCPBench, PLVR is competitive with the best baselines, although tool search remains more dependent on the student model. These results support program learning as a way to transfer expert procedures across frozen models, trading additional inference computation for more reliable tool use.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗