跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.25113 · v4

A learner-free swarm approximates the explore-exploit equilibrium allocation: A self-organized attractor in place of reinforcement-learning machinery

首次提交 2026-10-18 16:45
版本更新 2026-11-07 12:45
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Reinforcement learning (RL) solves the explore-exploit problem by training a learner on reward; its multi-agent, resource-sharing form has an equilibrium allocation as its optimum -- the ideal-free distribution (IFD), the Nash equilibrium of a congestion game. We show a minimal swarm approximates it with no learner at all. We present a decentralized, learner-free method for this problem: agents explore by heavy-tailed (Levy) flights, recruit neighbours to a discovery through a degree-normalized threshold cascade, and disperse as a patch crowds. The method drives the collective to the shape of the equilibrium allocation (pooled spatial matching slope 1.14, R^2=0.61) with no training, no stored parameters, and no reward in its dynamics; it reaches this as a self-organized attractor and holds it, re-finding it when the resources move -- though it reaches the shape, not the exact equilibrium, and stays measurably exploitable (Nash-gap 1.46). Coupling recruitment to movement causes the allocation: removing it collapses the matching (slope 0.006). Against Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) learners (feedforward, centralized-critic, graph message-passing, and recurrent) trained in the same sensing-limited environment, the method at zero training is the only arm left unbiased w.r.t. the IFD gradient (slope ~1, CI containing 1, vs learners 0.69-0.97, all under-concentrating) and ties the best learner's harvest where resource is clustered, while the learner collects more where resource is scarce (0.33 vs 0.22) and holds a tighter per-capita intake. Learning buys precision and transfer across reward structures, not a better allocation shape. A companion paper develops the mechanism.

作者备注:26 pages, 13 figures, 5 tables, code and data: https://github.com/galenwilkerson/self-organizing-reinforcement-learning

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v4 · 2026-11-07 12:45 · 最新观测版本

A learner-free swarm approximates the explore-exploit equilibrium allocation: A self-organized attractor in place of reinforcement-learning machinery

Reinforcement learning (RL) solves the explore-exploit problem by training a learner on reward; its multi-agent, resource-sharing form has an equilibrium allocation as its optimum -- the ideal-free distribution (IFD), the Nash equilibrium of a congestion game. We show a minimal swarm approximates it with no learner at all. We present a decentralized, learner-free method for this problem: agents explore by heavy-tailed (Levy) flights, recruit neighbours to a discovery through a degree-normalized threshold cascade, and disperse as a patch crowds. The method drives the collective to the shape of the equilibrium allocation (pooled spatial matching slope 1.14, R^2=0.61) with no training, no stored parameters, and no reward in its dynamics; it reaches this as a self-organized attractor and holds it, re-finding it when the resources move -- though it reaches the shape, not the exact equilibrium, and stays measurably exploitable (Nash-gap 1.46). Coupling recruitment to movement causes the allocation: removing it collapses the matching (slope 0.006). Against Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) learners (feedforward, centralized-critic, graph message-passing, and recurrent) trained in the same sensing-limited environment, the method at zero training is the only arm left unbiased w.r.t. the IFD gradient (slope ~1, CI containing 1, vs learners 0.69-0.97, all under-concentrating) and ties the best learner's harvest where resource is clustered, while the learner collects more where resource is scarce (0.33 vs 0.22) and holds a tighter per-capita intake. Learning buys precision and transfer across reward structures, not a better allocation shape. A companion paper develops the mechanism.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗