跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.25344 · v2

TOMORI: A Tool-Orchestrated Mixing Operator for REAPER Interaction

首次提交 2026-10-18 23:40
版本更新 2026-11-07 00:59
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Code-based agents can operate creative software, but mixing requests often describe an intended sound without specifying the edits needed to achieve it. We present TOMORI, a code-based mixing-agent harness for native digital audio workstation (DAW) control. Custom plugins provide REAPER project inspection, optional audio measurement, and execution of model-generated Lua code. All observations return as text; delivery includes an editable project and rendered audio. TOMORI-BENCH pairs 110 human-reviewed reference edits with three instruction forms and evaluates native DAW execution end to end through operation structure, parameter precision, and rendered-audio outcomes. Across 990 cases from three primary models, explicit instructions yield high reference agreement, while abstract requests reduce project agreement and audio improvement. Paired ablations show that the full workflow improves explicit execution over a single submission. Prompted audio measurement succeeds in all 28 selected abstract cases but yields no clear overall improvement on the reference-based metrics and increases tool calls. These results expose the gap between executable DAW control and precise realization of perceptual mixing goals.

作者备注:The authors are withdrawing this preprint at the request of their company

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-07 00:59 · 最新观测版本

TOMORI: A Tool-Orchestrated Mixing Operator for REAPER Interaction

Code-based agents can operate creative software, but mixing requests often describe an intended sound without specifying the edits needed to achieve it. We present TOMORI, a code-based mixing-agent harness for native digital audio workstation (DAW) control. Custom plugins provide REAPER project inspection, optional audio measurement, and execution of model-generated Lua code. All observations return as text; delivery includes an editable project and rendered audio. TOMORI-BENCH pairs 110 human-reviewed reference edits with three instruction forms and evaluates native DAW execution end to end through operation structure, parameter precision, and rendered-audio outcomes. Across 990 cases from three primary models, explicit instructions yield high reference agreement, while abstract requests reduce project agreement and audio improvement. Paired ablations show that the full workflow improves explicit execution over a single submission. Prompted audio measurement succeeds in all 28 selected abstract cases but yields no clear overall improvement on the reference-based metrics and increases tool calls. These results expose the gap between executable DAW control and precise realization of perceptual mixing goals.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗