跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.25623 · v3

High Precision Multiplicative-Error Approximation of $\#$SAC$^1$ Functions in Logspace Uniform AC$^1$

首次提交 2026-10-19 08:55
版本更新 2026-11-06 10:47
雷达观测 2026-11-09 10:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We show that approximations of $\#\mathsf{SAC}^1$ functions (i.e. functions computed by logspace-uniform polynomial-size positive semi-unbounded arithmetic circuits of depth $O(\log n)$) can be computed in logspace uniform $\mathsf{AC}^1$ (denoted as $\mathsf{L}\text{-}\mathsf{AC}^1$) with multiplicative error $2^{-\operatorname{poly}\log n}$.Previously, approximations of $\#\mathsf{SAC}^1$ functions were known to be in logspace-uniform $\mathsf{TC}^1$ via exact computation given by Allender, Jiao, Mahajan, and Vinay (TCS'98). A main corollary of our result is that the following models beyond $\mathsf{BPL}$ are computable by $\mathsf{L}\text{-}\mathsf{AC}^1$ with multiplicative error $2^{-\operatorname{poly}\log n}$: - Probabilistic Auxiliary Push-down Machines (Probabilistic $\mathsf{AuxPDM}$s), which are polynomial time logspace Turing Machines (TMs) with an auxiliary stack having unbounded size and a read-once random tape; - Read-$k$ Probabilistic TMs with polynomial time and logarithmic space, where $k$ is a constant and Read-$k$ means the random tape is two-way accessible and each cell can be visited for at most $k$ times. Notice that this is a direct generalization and improvement for $\mathsf{BPL}\subseteq\mathsf{L}\text{-}\mathsf{AC}^1$ of Cheng and Wang (CCC'24), and the approximation error is improved from additive reverse polynomial to multiplicative reverse quasi-polynomial. $\mathsf{AuxPDM}$ was introduced by Cook (JACM'71) and its probabilistic version was first studied by Macarie and Ogihara (TCS'98). Read-$k$ Probabilistic logspace TMs was studied by Impagliazzo, Nisan, Wigderson (STOC'94) where a pseudorandom generator for this model was given. We mention that multiplicative error approximations are stronger than additive error approximations in the sense that they can even be used to decide non-deterministic computations.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-06 10:47 · 最新观测版本

High Precision Multiplicative-Error Approximation of $\#$SAC$^1$ Functions in Logspace Uniform AC$^1$

We show that approximations of $\#\mathsf{SAC}^1$ functions (i.e. functions computed by logspace-uniform polynomial-size positive semi-unbounded arithmetic circuits of depth $O(\log n)$) can be computed in logspace uniform $\mathsf{AC}^1$ (denoted as $\mathsf{L}\text{-}\mathsf{AC}^1$) with multiplicative error $2^{-\operatorname{poly}\log n}$.Previously, approximations of $\#\mathsf{SAC}^1$ functions were known to be in logspace-uniform $\mathsf{TC}^1$ via exact computation given by Allender, Jiao, Mahajan, and Vinay (TCS'98). A main corollary of our result is that the following models beyond $\mathsf{BPL}$ are computable by $\mathsf{L}\text{-}\mathsf{AC}^1$ with multiplicative error $2^{-\operatorname{poly}\log n}$: - Probabilistic Auxiliary Push-down Machines (Probabilistic $\mathsf{AuxPDM}$s), which are polynomial time logspace Turing Machines (TMs) with an auxiliary stack having unbounded size and a read-once random tape; - Read-$k$ Probabilistic TMs with polynomial time and logarithmic space, where $k$ is a constant and Read-$k$ means the random tape is two-way accessible and each cell can be visited for at most $k$ times. Notice that this is a direct generalization and improvement for $\mathsf{BPL}\subseteq\mathsf{L}\text{-}\mathsf{AC}^1$ of Cheng and Wang (CCC'24), and the approximation error is improved from additive reverse polynomial to multiplicative reverse quasi-polynomial. $\mathsf{AuxPDM}$ was introduced by Cook (JACM'71) and its probabilistic version was first studied by Macarie and Ogihara (TCS'98). Read-$k$ Probabilistic logspace TMs was studied by Impagliazzo, Nisan, Wigderson (STOC'94) where a pseudorandom generator for this model was given. We mention that multiplicative error approximations are stronger than additive error approximations in the sense that they can even be used to decide non-deterministic computations.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗