跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.30430 · v2

Tight Bounds for Paging with Delay and Joint Replenishment with Varying Opening Costs

首次提交 2026-10-22 04:37
版本更新 2026-11-06 16:49
雷达观测 2026-11-09 11:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study weighted paging with delay, a generalization of classical paging in which requests may be served after their arrival, incurring delay costs while awaiting service. This model allows the algorithm to delay service and batch service requests over time, but also introduces significant challenges due to overlapping requests. While the problem is well understood in the unweighted setting, where optimal $O(\log k)$-competitive algorithms are known, the weighted case remains more elusive. The best previously known randomized algorithm, due to Gupta, Kumar, and Panigrahi, achieves an $O(\log k \log n)$-competitive ratio, leaving a gap between weighted and unweighted settings. We obtain a randomized $O(\log k)$-competitive algorithm, matching the lower bound inherited from classical paging. The core of our approach is a structural decomposition that separates the evolution of the cache over time from scheduling additional page loads, so as to make the solution feasible. We develop this approach first for paging with time windows, the special case in which each request must be served within a specified time interval. Given a sequence of cache configurations, we reduce the problem of augmenting this sequence to a feasible solution to a variant of the Joint Replenishment Problem with deadlines (JRP-D) with time-dependent opening costs. We design a constant-competitive online algorithm for this variant under a prediction model whose required information is available online in our paging reduction. Combining this algorithm with an existing online construction of cache configurations yields an $O(\log k)$-competitive algorithm for paging with time windows. We then extend the framework to obtain the same guarantee for weighted paging with a general delay function.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-06 16:49 · 最新观测版本

Tight Bounds for Paging with Delay and Joint Replenishment with Varying Opening Costs

We study weighted paging with delay, a generalization of classical paging in which requests may be served after their arrival, incurring delay costs while awaiting service. This model allows the algorithm to delay service and batch service requests over time, but also introduces significant challenges due to overlapping requests. While the problem is well understood in the unweighted setting, where optimal $O(\log k)$-competitive algorithms are known, the weighted case remains more elusive. The best previously known randomized algorithm, due to Gupta, Kumar, and Panigrahi, achieves an $O(\log k \log n)$-competitive ratio, leaving a gap between weighted and unweighted settings. We obtain a randomized $O(\log k)$-competitive algorithm, matching the lower bound inherited from classical paging. The core of our approach is a structural decomposition that separates the evolution of the cache over time from scheduling additional page loads, so as to make the solution feasible. We develop this approach first for paging with time windows, the special case in which each request must be served within a specified time interval. Given a sequence of cache configurations, we reduce the problem of augmenting this sequence to a feasible solution to a variant of the Joint Replenishment Problem with deadlines (JRP-D) with time-dependent opening costs. We design a constant-competitive online algorithm for this variant under a prediction model whose required information is available online in our paging reduction. Combining this algorithm with an existing online construction of cache configurations yields an $O(\log k)$-competitive algorithm for paging with time windows. We then extend the framework to obtain the same guarantee for weighted paging with a general delay function.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗