跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.33012 · v2

Recursive Semantic Divergence for LLM Agent Consistency

首次提交 2026-10-08 11:45
版本更新 2026-11-07 20:23
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large Language Model (LLM) agents with tool use can behave inconsistently across independent runs from identical states. They may call different tools, produce contradictory outputs, or follow divergent strategies.This variability compounds over time and undermines deployment reliability. Existing evaluation metrics primarily measure task correctness via completion-based scores and do not capture consistency in agent behavior across executions. Separately, agent behavior is analyzed either at the token level using probability distributions or at the single-response level using semantic clustering, but neither captures how inconsistency propagates across future turns of a trajectory. We introduce Recursive Semantic Divergence (RSD), a trajectory-level consistency metric adapted from bisimulation metrics in reinforcement learning. RSD measures the expected cumulative semantic disagreement between two independent rollouts of the same agent from the same state, using natural language inference to detect logical inconsistency. It is defined recursively over future states and approximated by a neural network trained on independent rollouts. The learned metric estimates future divergence from the current state, providing a consistency score at each turn without requiring the full trajectory to complete. When used as a reward signal for fine-tuning, RSD reduces AUC coefficient of variation (CV) by up to 30.9% on tau2-bench and 50.5% on ToolSandbox. Across Qwen-2.5 and Qwen-3.5 models, RSD reduces AUC CV in seven out of eight model-benchmark settings, while improving the final task progress in all eight settings.

作者备注:Accepted as a conference paper in NeurIPS 2026. Source code is publicly available in the repository in https://github.com/SAP-samples/agent-consistency-rsd

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-07 20:23 · 最新观测版本

Recursive Semantic Divergence for LLM Agent Consistency

Large Language Model (LLM) agents with tool use can behave inconsistently across independent runs from identical states. They may call different tools, produce contradictory outputs, or follow divergent strategies.This variability compounds over time and undermines deployment reliability. Existing evaluation metrics primarily measure task correctness via completion-based scores and do not capture consistency in agent behavior across executions. Separately, agent behavior is analyzed either at the token level using probability distributions or at the single-response level using semantic clustering, but neither captures how inconsistency propagates across future turns of a trajectory. We introduce Recursive Semantic Divergence (RSD), a trajectory-level consistency metric adapted from bisimulation metrics in reinforcement learning. RSD measures the expected cumulative semantic disagreement between two independent rollouts of the same agent from the same state, using natural language inference to detect logical inconsistency. It is defined recursively over future states and approximated by a neural network trained on independent rollouts. The learned metric estimates future divergence from the current state, providing a consistency score at each turn without requiring the full trajectory to complete. When used as a reward signal for fine-tuning, RSD reduces AUC coefficient of variation (CV) by up to 30.9% on tau2-bench and 50.5% on ToolSandbox. Across Qwen-2.5 and Qwen-3.5 models, RSD reduces AUC CV in seven out of eight model-benchmark settings, while improving the final task progress in all eight settings.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗