← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.33307 · v2
Tree Depth and Sample-Quality-Associated Features: Two Hidden Factors in Boruta Selection for RNA-Seq Data Classification
首次提交 2026-10-24 05:19
版本更新 2026-10-27 15:44
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
摘要
Boruta is a widely used method for selecting gene panels from RNA sequencing data, and its most used implementation recommends Random Forest trees of depth 3 to 7, an untested setting. We tested whether this setting changes which genes are selected, using pan-cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (10,469 tumors, 33 cancer types) and breast cancer PAM50 subtyping (981 tumors, 5 subtypes). A leakage-free protocol fitted every label-dependent step inside training folds, measured every effect against seed-to-seed variation, and held out a locked test set per task. In pan-cancer data, shallow trees changed the selection far more than a new seed did: the top-500 overlap with unlimited-depth selections was 0.37 at depth 5, against 0.84 to 0.93 between seeds at depth 5 or unlimited depth. Shallow trees confirmed 3.5 times fewer genes, missed markers of large classes and produced less accurate 50-gene panels (balanced accuracy 0.809 vs 0.889). The effect vanished once the cap reached about 60 to 75% of the depth that unrestricted trees grow to, set mainly by the number of classes, not sample size, and leaving depth uncapped cost no accuracy in either task. The effect replicated in a second cross-validation repeat and under permutation importance. About a third of pre-filtered candidates also tracked sample quality within class; a within-class filter removed them without loss of test accuracy (balanced accuracy 0.943 vs 0.942 with 1,000 genes). We recommend uncapped trees, or a cap chosen from the realized tree depth, and a within-class quality filter before Boruta.
作者备注：19 Pages, 6 Figures, 4 Tables
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v4 · 2026-11-01 07:32 · 最新观测版本
Tree Depth and Sample-Quality-Associated Features: Two Hidden Factors in Boruta Selection for RNA-Seq Data Classification
Random Forest--based selectors such as Boruta depend on tree depth, yet Boruta's most used implementation, BorutaPy, recommends depths of 3 to 7 without published evidence. We tested the effect of depth using pan-cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (10,469 tumors, 33 cancer types) and breast cancer PAM50 subtyping (981 tumors, 5 subtypes). Label-dependent steps were fitted inside training folds, effects were measured against seed-to-seed variation, and each task kept a locked test set. In pan-cancer data, depth 5 changed the selection far more than a new seed did: the top-500 Jaccard overlap with unlimited depth was 0.37, against 0.84 (depth 5) and 0.93 (unlimited) between seeds. Depth-5 trees confirmed 472 instead of 1,659 genes, covered fewer large-class markers (16% vs 62%) and gave less accurate 50-gene panels (balanced accuracy 0.809 vs 0.889). The effect vanished once the cap reached 61 to 76% of the median depth of unrestricted trees, a depth that depends mainly on the number of classes, not sample size. In PAM50 subtyping (median depth 12) the effect was small, and leaving depth uncapped cost no accuracy in either task. It replicated in a second cross-validation repeat and under permutation importance. About a third of pre-filtered candidates correlated within class with the number of detected genes, a sample-quality measure; a within-class filter removed them without loss of test accuracy (0.943 vs 0.942 balanced accuracy, 1,000 genes). We recommend uncapped trees, or a cap above 75% of the realized median depth, and a within-class quality filter before Boruta.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗v3 · 2026-10-29 15:56
Tree Depth and Sample-Quality-Associated Features: Two Hidden Factors in Boruta Selection for RNA-Seq Data Classification
Random Forest--based selectors such as Boruta depend on tree depth, yet Boruta's most used implementation, BorutaPy, recommends depths of 3 to 7 without published evidence. We tested the effect of depth using pan-cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (10,469 tumors, 33 cancer types) and breast cancer PAM50 subtyping (981 tumors, 5 subtypes). Label-dependent steps were fitted inside training folds, effects were measured against seed-to-seed variation, and each task had a locked test set. In pan-cancer data, depth 5 changed the selection far more than a new seed did: the top-500 Jaccard overlap with unlimited depth was 0.37, against 0.84 (depth 5) and 0.93 (unlimited) between seeds. Depth-5 trees confirmed 472 instead of 1,659 genes, covered fewer large-class markers (16% vs 62%) and gave less accurate 50-gene panels (balanced accuracy 0.809 vs 0.889). The effect vanished once the cap reached 61 to 76% of the median depth of unrestricted trees, a depth set mainly by the number of classes, not sample size. In PAM50 subtyping (median depth 12) the effect was small, and leaving depth uncapped cost no accuracy in either task. The effect replicated in a second cross-validation repeat and under permutation importance. About a third of pre-filtered candidates correlated within class with the number of detected genes, a sample-quality measure; a within-class filter removed them without loss of test accuracy (0.943 vs 0.942 balanced accuracy, 1,000 genes). We recommend uncapped trees, or a cap above 75% of the realized median depth, and a within-class quality filter before Boruta.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗v2 · 2026-10-27 15:44
Tree Depth and Sample-Quality-Associated Features: Two Hidden Factors in Boruta Selection for RNA-Seq Data Classification
Boruta is a widely used method for selecting gene panels from RNA sequencing data, and its most used implementation recommends Random Forest trees of depth 3 to 7, an untested setting. We tested whether this setting changes which genes are selected, using pan-cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (10,469 tumors, 33 cancer types) and breast cancer PAM50 subtyping (981 tumors, 5 subtypes). A leakage-free protocol fitted every label-dependent step inside training folds, measured every effect against seed-to-seed variation, and held out a locked test set per task. In pan-cancer data, shallow trees changed the selection far more than a new seed did: the top-500 overlap with unlimited-depth selections was 0.37 at depth 5, against 0.84 to 0.93 between seeds at depth 5 or unlimited depth. Shallow trees confirmed 3.5 times fewer genes, missed markers of large classes and produced less accurate 50-gene panels (balanced accuracy 0.809 vs 0.889). The effect vanished once the cap reached about 60 to 75% of the depth that unrestricted trees grow to, set mainly by the number of classes, not sample size, and leaving depth uncapped cost no accuracy in either task. The effect replicated in a second cross-validation repeat and under permutation importance. About a third of pre-filtered candidates also tracked sample quality within class; a within-class filter removed them without loss of test accuracy (balanced accuracy 0.943 vs 0.942 with 1,000 genes). We recommend uncapped trees, or a cap chosen from the realized tree depth, and a within-class quality filter before Boruta.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗