跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.33932 · v2

FastSAR: Open-Source SAR Image Formation on CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs, and a Matched Comparison of Algorithms, Precisions, and Processors

首次提交 2026-10-25 05:47
版本更新 2026-11-09 03:19
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The number of spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) collectors is growing exponentially, each returning raw collections that must be formed into images. Exact backprojection needs 1.6 trillion interpolated reads and 90 trillion floating-point operations for a 108-megapixel Umbra image. How long it takes to form an image, and at what price, depends on the algorithm, the arithmetic, and the hardware. Open-source implementations have never been compared on matched hardware against a common reference, and none run on Google tensor processing units (TPUs). This paper presents FastSAR, an open-source SAR image formation library for central processing units (CPUs), NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs), and TPUs. With it, we compare three SAR image formation algorithms, four floating-point formats, and six cloud devices in every supported combination, with cost per image at on-demand cloud prices as the fair common measure. FastSAR is 1.06 to 22,000 times faster than the tested open-source implementations at equal or better accuracy, and the full suite of hardware, algorithm, and floating-point combinations lets a user choose the Pareto-optimal configuration for their balance of accuracy, speed, and cost. The L4 GPU forms images the cheapest overall. Larger GPUs are faster but cost more per image because their price rises faster than their speed. The TPUs come close to the GPUs in cost, but only for the factorized algorithm, and the CPU is far less efficient in both speed and cost. Lower precision formats buy less of a speedup than expected, and each step down in precision costs accuracy.

作者备注:39 pages, 8 figures. Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Code: https://github.com/saulpingerman/FastSAR (pip install fastsar); measurements and paper source: https://github.com/saulpingerman/sar-accel-study

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-09 03:19 · 最新观测版本

FastSAR: Open-Source SAR Image Formation on CPUs, GPUs, and TPUs, and a Matched Comparison of Algorithms, Precisions, and Processors

The number of spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) collectors is growing exponentially, each returning raw collections that must be formed into images. Exact backprojection needs 1.6 trillion interpolated reads and 90 trillion floating-point operations for a 108-megapixel Umbra image. How long it takes to form an image, and at what price, depends on the algorithm, the arithmetic, and the hardware. Open-source implementations have never been compared on matched hardware against a common reference, and none run on Google tensor processing units (TPUs). This paper presents FastSAR, an open-source SAR image formation library for central processing units (CPUs), NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs), and TPUs. With it, we compare three SAR image formation algorithms, four floating-point formats, and six cloud devices in every supported combination, with cost per image at on-demand cloud prices as the fair common measure. FastSAR is 1.06 to 22,000 times faster than the tested open-source implementations at equal or better accuracy, and the full suite of hardware, algorithm, and floating-point combinations lets a user choose the Pareto-optimal configuration for their balance of accuracy, speed, and cost. The L4 GPU forms images the cheapest overall. Larger GPUs are faster but cost more per image because their price rises faster than their speed. The TPUs come close to the GPUs in cost, but only for the factorized algorithm, and the CPU is far less efficient in both speed and cost. Lower precision formats buy less of a speedup than expected, and each step down in precision costs accuracy.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗