← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.34545 · v1
VTC-AUDIT: An Interventional Reliability Audit for Visual-Token Compression under Paired Image Shifts
首次提交 2026-10-26 04:15
版本更新 2026-10-26 04:15
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:36
摘要
Visual-token compression is usually evaluated by clean accuracy and efficiency, but these averages do not reveal failures that compression introduces under an image shift where the uncompressed model stays correct. We introduce VTC-AUDIT, which estimates this incremental risk only on pairs where the full model is correct on both images and the compressed model is correct on the clean image. The four arms then cross two binary choices: which image selects the retained token positions, and which image supplies the visual features. We audit three open 8-9B vision-language models on four tasks and eight pre-specified shifts. We evaluate two training-free compressors---hard-pruning DivPrune and prune-and-merge ApET---at a matched 25% retained-position budget, producing 708,000 inference records. Reselecting positions on the shifted image, rather than reusing the clean-image positions, raises the failure rate in all six model-compressor settings. The increase is 3.04-9.60 percentage points for DivPrune and 2.05-4.20 percentage points for ApET, with every 95% interval above zero. Repeating the audit on a separately resampled second manifest reproduces all six increases. In a pooled monitor audit across the four benchmarks, support Jaccard instability fails the practical AUROC criterion of 0.65 in all six settings, whereas clean compressed-model uncertainty clears it. Thus, support turnover is a weak ranking signal under the audited benchmark mixture, while clean compressed-model uncertainty is substantially more informative. These results suggest that future visual-token compression evaluations should report conditional reliability alongside clean accuracy and efficiency.
作者备注：9 pages, 6 tables. Code and experimental results: https://github.com/IsaacLi74/VTC-AUDIT
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-10-26 04:15 · 最新观测版本
VTC-AUDIT: An Interventional Reliability Audit for Visual-Token Compression under Paired Image Shifts
Visual-token compression is usually evaluated by clean accuracy and efficiency, but these averages do not reveal failures that compression introduces under an image shift where the uncompressed model stays correct. We introduce VTC-AUDIT, which estimates this incremental risk only on pairs where the full model is correct on both images and the compressed model is correct on the clean image. The four arms then cross two binary choices: which image selects the retained token positions, and which image supplies the visual features. We audit three open 8-9B vision-language models on four tasks and eight pre-specified shifts. We evaluate two training-free compressors---hard-pruning DivPrune and prune-and-merge ApET---at a matched 25% retained-position budget, producing 708,000 inference records. Reselecting positions on the shifted image, rather than reusing the clean-image positions, raises the failure rate in all six model-compressor settings. The increase is 3.04-9.60 percentage points for DivPrune and 2.05-4.20 percentage points for ApET, with every 95% interval above zero. Repeating the audit on a separately resampled second manifest reproduces all six increases. In a pooled monitor audit across the four benchmarks, support Jaccard instability fails the practical AUROC criterion of 0.65 in all six settings, whereas clean compressed-model uncertainty clears it. Thus, support turnover is a weak ranking signal under the audited benchmark mixture, while clean compressed-model uncertainty is substantially more informative. These results suggest that future visual-token compression evaluations should report conditional reliability alongside clean accuracy and efficiency.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗