← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.35144 · v1
Realizing Low-Precision Storage and Sparse Execution in a Folded FPGA Speech Enhancer
首次提交 2026-10-26 18:12
版本更新 2026-10-26 18:12
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:36
摘要
Hardware-aware training often optimizes FPGA resources, latency, or bit operations, but folding changes what compression saves: shared arithmetic decouples precision, weight storage, and scheduled work. We derive training objectives from the measured costs of a folded streaming speech-enhancement accelerator. Mixed-precision weights reduce on-chip storage; structured channel sparsity removes entire operations from the engine schedule. We deploy a bit-exact implementation on the Kria KV260. The best sparse model eliminates 47.3% of convolution MACs, cutting frame time by 45% (1.86 to 1.03 ms) and dynamic energy by 60% (83 to 33 $μ$J/frame) against a storage-priced model measured in the same session, with higher speech quality. Relative to the most efficient dense build measured separately, frame time falls by 42% and energy by 48%. Reducing weight width from 8 to 6 bits lowers dynamic power by 27% but changes frame time by less than 5%. Plain channel group-lasso removes more work than cycle-cost-weighted lasso. Thus, folded-accelerator training should price storage and removable work separately, rather than rely on a single bit-operation metric.
作者备注：5 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables. Submitted to IEEE ISCAS 2027
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-10-26 18:12 · 最新观测版本
Realizing Low-Precision Storage and Sparse Execution in a Folded FPGA Speech Enhancer
Hardware-aware training often optimizes FPGA resources, latency, or bit operations, but folding changes what compression saves: shared arithmetic decouples precision, weight storage, and scheduled work. We derive training objectives from the measured costs of a folded streaming speech-enhancement accelerator. Mixed-precision weights reduce on-chip storage; structured channel sparsity removes entire operations from the engine schedule. We deploy a bit-exact implementation on the Kria KV260. The best sparse model eliminates 47.3% of convolution MACs, cutting frame time by 45% (1.86 to 1.03 ms) and dynamic energy by 60% (83 to 33 $μ$J/frame) against a storage-priced model measured in the same session, with higher speech quality. Relative to the most efficient dense build measured separately, frame time falls by 42% and energy by 48%. Reducing weight width from 8 to 6 bits lowers dynamic power by 27% but changes frame time by less than 5%. Plain channel group-lasso removes more work than cycle-cost-weighted lasso. Thus, folded-accelerator training should price storage and removable work separately, rather than rely on a single bit-operation metric.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗