跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.35659 · v1

Environment Edits as a Corrective Signal for Reward Learning

首次提交 2026-10-27 00:04
版本更新 2026-10-27 00:04
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Robot corrections allow people to adjust a robot's behavior, but a single correction changes many features. Also, preferences about object attributes and relationships between objects cannot be expressed by moving the robot. We propose environment edits as a complementary form of feedback. The robot's motion is held constant as the human edits the scene, so the only explanation for the edit is the moved object. We introduce Feature Learning from Environmental and Robot-Relational Edit Traces (FERRET), which learns preferences from both robot and environment corrections. We show that environment edits are able to disambiguate features and learn preferences that robot corrections alone cannot.

作者备注:Accepted to CoRL 2026 Workshop on Learning from Corrections

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-27 00:04 · 最新观测版本

Environment Edits as a Corrective Signal for Reward Learning

Robot corrections allow people to adjust a robot's behavior, but a single correction changes many features. Also, preferences about object attributes and relationships between objects cannot be expressed by moving the robot. We propose environment edits as a complementary form of feedback. The robot's motion is held constant as the human edits the scene, so the only explanation for the edit is the moved object. We introduce Feature Learning from Environmental and Robot-Relational Edit Traces (FERRET), which learns preferences from both robot and environment corrections. We show that environment edits are able to disambiguate features and learn preferences that robot corrections alone cannot.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗