跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.35762 · v1

The Evolution and 'Chineseness' of Urban Screens in China: From Propaganda Posters to Smart City Interfaces

首次提交 2026-10-27 01:06
版本更新 2026-10-27 01:06
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Urban screens have become a global feature of the media city, yet their developmental paths are not universal. This paper argues that the evolution of urban screens in China constitutes a distinct paradigm of media urbanism, termed Chineseness, understood here not as cultural essence but as a relational, historically situated configuration of three linked elements: deep-rooted lineages of public communication; state-steered technological leapfrogging driven by industrial policy and mega-events; and a regulatory paradox that enables spectacular scale while tightening operational control. Drawing on a five-stage genealogy (1990-present), a chronology of representative screens, and five paradigmatic cases, the study shows how this configuration produces temporal-spatial compression, the coexistence of multiple technological generations, and privileges collective witnessing over device-centric interactivity. The paper contributes a documented genealogy of Chinese urban screens, develops temporal-spatial compression and collective witnessing as analytical tools for non-Western media ecologies, and positions Chineseness as a globally relevant alternative to market-led models of media architecture.

作者备注:14 pages. Accepted at the Media Architecture Biennale 2025 (MAB25), Bangkok

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-27 01:06 · 最新观测版本

The Evolution and 'Chineseness' of Urban Screens in China: From Propaganda Posters to Smart City Interfaces

Urban screens have become a global feature of the media city, yet their developmental paths are not universal. This paper argues that the evolution of urban screens in China constitutes a distinct paradigm of media urbanism, termed Chineseness, understood here not as cultural essence but as a relational, historically situated configuration of three linked elements: deep-rooted lineages of public communication; state-steered technological leapfrogging driven by industrial policy and mega-events; and a regulatory paradox that enables spectacular scale while tightening operational control. Drawing on a five-stage genealogy (1990-present), a chronology of representative screens, and five paradigmatic cases, the study shows how this configuration produces temporal-spatial compression, the coexistence of multiple technological generations, and privileges collective witnessing over device-centric interactivity. The paper contributes a documented genealogy of Chinese urban screens, develops temporal-spatial compression and collective witnessing as analytical tools for non-Western media ecologies, and positions Chineseness as a globally relevant alternative to market-led models of media architecture.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗